Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31059681›Full record

ArticleThe Annals of thoracic surgery2019

Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA in Plasma: A Potential Biomarker for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Matthew Egyud, Mohamedtaki Tejani, Arjun Pennathur, James Luketich, Praveen Sridhar, Emiko Yamada, Anders Ståhlberg, Stefan Filges, Paul Krzyzanowski, Jennifer Jackson and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Circulating tumor DNA predicts recurrence and survival in patients with resectable gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Matthew EgyudDepartment of Surgery, Boston University/Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mohamedtaki TejaniDepartment of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Arjun PennathurDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
James LuketichDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Praveen SridharDepartment of Surgery, Boston University/Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Emiko YamadaDepartment of Surgery, Boston University/Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Anders StåhlbergSahlgrenska Cancer Center, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Stefan FilgesSahlgrenska Cancer Center, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Paul KrzyzanowskiOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer JacksonDepartment of Surgery, Boston University/Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Irina KalatskayaOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Wei JiaoOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gradon NielsenDepartment of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Zhongren ZhouDepartment of Pathology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Virginia LitleDepartment of Surgery, Boston University/Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lincoln SteinOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tony GodfreyDepartment of Surgery, Boston University/Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: godfreyt@bu.edu.
Ontario Institute for Cancer Research · CABoston Medical Center · USBoston University · USUniversity of Rochester · USUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Development of diagnostic and prognostic tests for esophageal adenocarcinomaR01CA208599 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI GODFREY, TONY E · 2017 to 2022
$2.4M
Innovative approach to cancer detection and treatment monitoringR21CA172999 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI GODFREY, TONY E · 2013 to 2014
$397k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA208599NCI NIH HHS R21 CA172999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent literature has demonstrated the potential of "liquid biopsy" and detection of circulating tumor (ct)DNA as a cancer biomarker. However, to date there is a lack of data specific to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). This study was conducted to determine how detection and quantification of ctDNA changes with disease burden in patients with EAC and evaluate its potential as a biomarker in this population.

methodsBlood samples were obtained from patients with stage I to IV EAC. Longitudinal blood samples were collected from a subset of patients. Imaging studies and pathology reports were reviewed to determine disease course. Tumor samples were sequenced to identify mutations. Mutations in plasma DNA were detected using custom, barcoded, patient-specific sequencing libraries. Mutations in plasma were quantified, and associations with disease stage and response to therapy were explored.

resultsPlasma samples from a final cohort of 38 patients were evaluated. Baseline plasma samples were ctDNA positive for 18 patients (47%) overall, with tumor allele frequencies ranging from 0.05% to 5.30%. Detection frequency of ctDNA and quantity of ctDNA increased with stage. Data from longitudinal samples indicate that ctDNA levels correlate with and precede evidence of response to therapy or recurrence.

conclusionsctDNA can be detected in plasma of EAC patients and correlates with disease burden. Detection of ctDNA in early-stage EAC is challenging and may limit diagnostic applications. However, our data demonstrate the potential of ctDNA as a dynamic biomarker to monitor treatment response and disease recurrence in patients with EAC.

Indexed as

MutationAdenocarcinomaBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNADisease ProgressionDNA, NeoplasmEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLiquid BiopsyMaleNeoplasm StagingBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNADNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID31059681
PMCPMC6676214
OpenAlexW2943565361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.