Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31059662›Full record

ReviewPerspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science2019

Affective Working Memory: An Integrative Psychological Construct.

Joseph A Mikels, Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Social Working Memory: a Systematic Review.Neuropsychology review · 2026
    Review
  3. Shared and unique neural correlates of reappraisal generation and implementation.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Piecing together the puzzle of emotional consciousness.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph A Mikels1 Department of Psychology, DePaul University.ORCID 0000-0002-2679-4393
Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz2 Department of Psychology, University of Michigan.ORCID 0000-0002-6977-3429
DePaul University · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Emotion, Aging, and Decision MakingR01AG043533 · NIA · DE PAUL UNIVERSITY · PI MIKELS, JOSEPH A · 2014 to 2025
$3.6M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG043533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When people ruminate about an unfortunate encounter with a loved one, savor a long-sought accomplishment, or hold in mind feelings from a marvelous or regretfully tragic moment, what mental processes orchestrate these psychological phenomena? Such experiences typify how affect interacts with working memory, which we posit can occur in three primary ways: emotional experiences can modulate working memory, working memory can modulate emotional experiences, and feelings can be the mental representations maintained by working memory. We propose that this last mode constitutes distinct neuropsychological processes that support the integration of particular cognitive and affective processes:

Indexed as

AffectBrainEmotional IntelligenceEmotionsHumansMemory, Short-Termaffectemotionemotional intelligenceemotion regulationworking memory

Identifiers

PMID31059662
PMCPMC6606331
OpenAlexW2944081770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.