Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31058886›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2019

Antimicrobial Synergy Testing by the Inkjet Printer-assisted Automated Checkerboard Array and the Manual Time-kill Method.

Thea Brennan-Krohn, James E Kirby

Open access · bronzeAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The KW18 peptide acts as a dual antimicrobial and immunomodulatory therapeutic candidate in the context of antimicrobial resistance.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Thea Brennan-KrohnDepartment of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Division of Infectious Diseases, Boston Children's Hospital; Harvard Medical School.
James E KirbyDepartment of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Harvard Medical School; jekirby@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Boston Children's Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

INFECTIOUS DISEASE AND BASIC MICROBIOLOGICAL MECHANISMST32AI007061 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Marcia B Goldberg · 1985 to 2026
$12.1M
Pediatric Infectious Diseases Research TrainingT32HD055148 · NICHD · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI WESSELS, MICHAEL R · 2008 to 2018
$2.7M
Plasmid Eviction to Restore Susceptibility in Carbapenem-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeR33AI119114 · NIAID · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI KIRBY, JAMES E · 2017 to 2019
$1.5M
Antimicrobial Synergy for Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae - Administrative SupplementK08AI132716 · NIAID · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BRENNAN-KROHN, THEA · 2018 to 2022
$916k
NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI132716NIAID NIH HHS R33 AI119114NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007061NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD055148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As rates of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens continue to rise, outpacing the development of new antimicrobials, novel approaches to treatment of MDR bacteria are increasingly becoming a necessity. One such approach is combination therapy, in which two or more antibiotics are used together to treat an infection against which one or both of the drugs may be ineffective alone. When two drugs, in combination, exert a greater than additive effect, they are considered synergistic. In vitro investigation of synergistic activity is an important first step in evaluating the possible efficacy of drug combinations. Two main in vitro synergy testing methods have been developed: the checkerboard array and the time-kill study. In this paper, we present an automated checkerboard array method that makes use of inkjet printing technology to increase the efficiency and accuracy of this technique, as well as a standard manual time-kill synergy method. The automated checkerboard array can serve as a high-throughput screening assay, while the manual time-kill study provides additional, complementary data on synergistic activity and killing. The checkerboard array is a modification of standard minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing, in which bacteria are incubated with antibiotics at different concentration combinations and evaluated for growth inhibition after overnight incubation. Manual performance of the checkerboard array requires a laborious and error-prone series of calculations and dilutions. In the automated method presented here, the calculation and dispensing of required antibiotic stock solution volumes are automated through the use of inkjet printer technology. In the time-kill synergy assay, bacteria are incubated with the antibiotics of interest, both together and individually, and sampled at intervals over the course of 24 h for quantitative culture. The results can determine whether a combination is synergistic and whether it is bactericidal, and provide data on inhibition and killing of bacteria over time.

Indexed as

Computer PeripheralsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialDrug SynergismMicrobial Sensitivity TestsTimeAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID31058886
PMCPMC6698365
OpenAlexW2936337610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.