ArticleThe Journal of head trauma rehabilitation
Developing the Disorders of Consciousness Guideline and Challenges of Integrating Shared Decision-Making Into Clinical Practice.
Article in The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Neurological Rehabilitation of Adults With Coma and Disorders of Consciousness.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023Guideline
- Implementation of lifestyle recommendations in the Dutch medical specialists' guidelines: a mixed-methods cross-sectional survey study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- International survey on the implementation of the European and American guidelines on disorders of consciousness.Journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Determinants of Awareness of Clinical Practice Guidelines among Healthcare Users in Japan.Journal of patient experience · 2023Article
- Ethical and legal considerations related to disorders of consciousness.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2020Review
- THE JEREMIAH METZGER LECTURE: DISORDERS OF CONSCIOUSNESS AND THE NORMATIVE UNCERTAINTY OF AN EMERGING NOSOLOGY.Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo review methodology informing evidence-based guideline development and integration of guidelines into clinical care through shared decision-making (SDM) and highlight challenges to SDM in disorders of consciousness.
methodsWe describe guideline development strategies and implications for use, approaches to SDM generally and with surrogate decision makers, and considerations when implementing the prolonged disorders of consciousness guideline into clinical care.
resultsClinical practice guidelines aim to improve high-quality patient care and outcomes by assessing the best medical evidence and incorporating this into care recommendations. This is accomplished through transparent methodology and compliance with published standards. Guidelines support SDM with patients and surrogate decision makers. Effective SDM can be challenging in conditions such as prolonged disorders of consciousness where surrogates are required, but assessment of patient values and incorporation of these values into SDM is ethically critical.
conclusionsRecently published disorders of consciousness guideline recommendations provide strategies for clinicians to enhance quality care for individuals with prolonged disorders of consciousness. They also provide details helping clinicians partner with individuals with disorders of consciousness and their surrogates. Further research is needed into many aspects of caring for individuals with disorders of consciousness and optimal strategies for partnering with surrogates in decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.