Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31058653›Full record

ArticleBlood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis2019

Comparison of clot-based and chromogenic assay for the determination of protein c activity.

Tariq M Roshan, Nancy Stein, Xiu Y Jiang

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Performance of Chromogenic Protein C (PC) Testing.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Laboratory Limitations of Excluding Hereditary Protein C Deficiency by Chromogenic Assay: Discrepancies of Phenotype and Genotype.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tariq M RoshanDivision of Hematopathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary/Calgary Laboratory Services (CLS), Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Nancy Stein
Xiu Y Jiang
University of Calgary · CACalgary Laboratory Services · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

: Activated protein C inactivates factor Va and VIIIa. Deficiency of this natural anticoagulant may result in recurrent venous thrombosis. Performance characteristics of clot-based and chromogenic protein C activity assays are different. The clot-based assay has limitations because of interference with coagulation inhibitors resulting in spuriously increased protein C levels or underestimation because of elevated levels of factor VIII and Factor V-Leiden mutation. The chromogenic assay is not influenced by such interferences but only detects functional defects of protein C that involve the active site rendering it insensitive to rare mutations. To compare two methods, we conducted a retrospective study from January 2015 to June 2017. Our results showed a good correlation between clot-based and chromogenic assay (R = 0.94 and r = 0.88). The study of agreement between the two methods by the Bland-Altman method showed that chromogenic method on an average measures 7.8% more protein C than that of clot-based. The results also showed that the bias between the two methods is significant. The positive trend noted was contributed by the values of less than 20% of protein C. Both clot-based and chromogenic assays had high sensitivity; however, the chromogenic assay showed better specificity (97%) as compared with the clot-based assay (93%). In conclusion, we recommend the chromogenic method as the assay of choice, which is also recommended by the College of American Pathologist Consensus Study over activated partial thromboplastin time-based assay. We have shown here that despite a good correlation between the two techniques, there is a difference as highlighted by the difference plots.

Indexed as

BiasBlood Coagulation TestsChromogenic CompoundsHumansPartial Thromboplastin TimeProtein CReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityChromogenic CompoundsProtein C

Identifiers

PMID31058653
PMCPMC6594720
OpenAlexW2944264251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.