ArticleBioResearch open access2019
Acceptability of Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling Among a National Sample of Women in the United States.
Article in BioResearch open access, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of anal precancer screening on patient-reported outcomes among men-who-have-sex-with-men living with HIV: a scoping review.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2026Article
- Analytical performance and clinical usability of a low-cost vaginal swab for sensitive detection of high-risk human papillomavirus.Gates open research · 2026Article
- Factors associated with women's choice for mode of cervical sampling in future cervical cancer screening.PloS one · 2026Article
- Acceptability of Vaginal Human Papillomavirus Self-Collection Among Colposcopy Clinic Attendees.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Results of a Human Papillomavirus Self-Collection Educational Intervention for Health Care Providers in Appalachia.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Article
- Study of Knowledge, Attitudes, Acceptability and Preference of Home-based HPV Self-Sampling Among a Population of Moroccan Women.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024Article
- Rural women's preferences for cervical cancer screening via HPV self-sampling: a discrete choice experiment study in chidamoyo, Hurungwe District, Zimbabwe.AJOG global reports · 2024Article
- HPV self-collection for cervical cancer screening among survivors of sexual trauma: a qualitative study.BMC women's health · 2024Observational
- Article
- Cervical cancer screening and vaccination acceptability and attitudes among Arab American women in Southeastern Michigan: a qualitative study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Comparison of diagnostic accuracy and acceptability of self-sampling devices for human Papillomavirus detection: A systematic review.Preventive medicine reports · 2024Review
- HPV self-sampling among women in the United States: preferences for implementation.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2024Article
- Innovations in healthcare delivery: Human papilloma virus self sampling diagnostics and participatory innovations for CCS.Cancer medicine · 2023Review
- Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cancer Screening Delays.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023Article
- Validity and acceptance of self vs conventional sampling for the analysis of human papillomavirus and Pap smear.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Clinician practices, knowledge, and attitudes regarding primary human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening: A mixed-methods study in Indiana.Preventive medicine reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Changes in Cancer Screening in the US During the COVID-19 Pandemic.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Low rates of HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screening: Challenges and opportunities in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.Preventive medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling continues to emerge as a potential cervical cancer screening strategy in the United States, it is necessary to examine women's acceptability of this screening approach. Furthermore, since several HPV self-sampling devices exist, it is important to determine if women's preferences differ by device type. We conducted an online survey in Fall 2017 with a national sample of women (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.