Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31057953›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2019

Molecular understanding of pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis.

Sakae Tanaka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Romosozumab in patients who experienced an on-study fracture: post hoc analyses of the FRAME and ARCH phase 3 trials.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Elevation of transaminases associated with teriparatide treatment: a case report.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2022
    Review
  6. Sclerostin: from bench to bedside.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Preventive Effects ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sakae TanakaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a serious health concern, particularly in aged societies. The burden of osteoporosis with its associated morbidity and mortality due to fracture has become a critical socioeconomic problem.Skeletal integrity is maintained through a balance of bone resorption and bone formation. The bone turnover process, called bone remodelling.Recently, a number of anti-osteoporosis drugs with excellent anti-osteoporosis and fracture effects have been developed. They are mainly classified into two groups according to their effects on bone remodelling: anti-resorptive agents and anabolic agents. Cite this article:

Indexed as

abaloparatidebisphosphonatedenosumaboestrogenosteoporosisromosozumabSERMteriparatide

Identifiers

PMID31057953
PMCPMC6491949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.