ArticleMicrosystems & nanoengineering2019
Machine learning metrology of cell confinement in melt electrowritten three-dimensional biomaterial substrates.
Article in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI for bioactive materials: From material design to biological applications.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for design strategies of tissue engineering materials.Fundamental research · 2026Review
- Longitudinal and radial microgradients in porosity and canal diameter in femur bone and its implications for bone regeneration and bone repair implants.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Hydrogels for Osteochondral Interface Regeneration: Biomaterial Types, Processes, and Animal Models.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Engineering Extracellular Microenvironments: The Impact of Fibrous Materials on Cell Behavior.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Review
- Three-Dimensional Printing and Bioprinting Strategies for Cardiovascular Constructs: From Printing Inks to Vascularization.Polymers · 2025Review
- AI-driven 3D bioprinting for regenerative medicine: From bench to bedside.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Melt Electrowriting of Elastic Scaffolds Using PEOT-PBT Multi-block Copolymer.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
- Evaluation of image analysis tools for the measurement of cellular morphology.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- In Vitro Investigation of 3D Printed Hydrogel Scaffolds with Electrospun Tidemark Component for Modeling Osteochondral Interface.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Towards industry-ready additive manufacturing: AI-enabled closed-loop control for 3D melt electrowriting.Communications engineering · 2024Article
- Mapping Biomaterial Complexity by Machine Learning.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2024Review
- Recent advancements in polymeric heart valves: From basic research to clinical trials.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Intelligent electrospinning nanofibrous membranes for monitoring and promotion of the wound healing.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Bone Regeneration Induced by Patient-Adapted Mg Alloy-Based Scaffolds for Bone Defects: Present and Future Perspectives.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Unveiling the potential of melt electrowriting in regenerative dental medicine.Acta biomaterialia · 2023Review
- Machine learning and 3D bioprinting.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
- Multiscale design of cell-free biologically active architectural structures.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- A holistic model for melt electrowritten three-dimensional structured materials based on residual charge.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
- Machine learning boosts three-dimensional bioprinting.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tuning cell shape by altering the biophysical properties of biomaterial substrates on which cells operate would provide a potential shape-driven pathway to control cell phenotype. However, there is an unexplored dimensional scale window of three-dimensional (3D) substrates with precisely tunable porous microarchitectures and geometrical feature sizes at the cell's operating length scales (10-100 μm). This paper demonstrates the fabrication of such high-fidelity fibrous substrates using a melt electrowriting (MEW) technique. This advanced manufacturing approach is biologically qualified with a metrology framework that models and classifies cell confinement states under various substrate dimensionalities and architectures. Using fibroblasts as a model cell system, the mechanosensing response of adherent cells is investigated as a function of variable substrate dimensionality (2D vs. 3D) and porous microarchitecture (randomly oriented, "non-woven" vs. precision-stacked, "woven"). Single-cell confinement states are modeled using confocal fluorescence microscopy in conjunction with an automated single-cell bioimage data analysis workflow that extracts quantitative metrics of the whole cell and sub-cellular focal adhesion protein features measured. The extracted multidimensional dataset is employed to train a machine learning algorithm to classify cell shape phenotypes. The results show that cells assume distinct confinement states that are enforced by the prescribed substrate dimensionalities and porous microarchitectures with the woven MEW substrates promoting the highest cell shape homogeneity compared to non-woven fibrous substrates. The technology platform established here constitutes a significant step towards the development of integrated additive manufacturing-metrology platforms for a wide range of applications including fundamental mechanobiology studies and 3D bioprinting of tissue constructs to yield specific biological designs qualified at the single-cell level.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.