Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31057909›Full record

ArticleMicrosystems & nanoengineering2018

Shaped 3D microcarriers for adherent cell culture and analysis.

Chueh-Yu Wu, Daniel Stoecklein, Aditya Kommajosula, Jonathan Lin, Keegan Owsley, Baskar Ganapathysubramanian, Dino Di Carlo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Lab on a Particle Technologies.Analytical chemistry · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Polymeric microcarriers for minimally-invasive cell delivery.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Scaffolding Biomaterials for 3D Cultivated Meat: Prospects and Challenges.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chueh-Yu Wu1Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA USA.
Daniel Stoecklein5Department of Mechanical Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA USA.
Aditya Kommajosula5Department of Mechanical Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA USA.
Jonathan Lin1Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA USA.
Keegan Owsley1Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA USA.
Baskar Ganapathysubramanian5Department of Mechanical Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA USA.
Dino Di Carlo1Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA USA.
University of California, Los Angeles · USIowa State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard tissue culture of adherent cells is known to poorly replicate physiology and often entails suspending cells in solution for analysis and sorting, which modulates protein expression and eliminates intercellular connections. To allow adherent culture and processing in flow, we present 3D-shaped hydrogel cell microcarriers, which are designed with a recessed nook in a first dimension to provide a tunable shear-stress shelter for cell growth, and a dumbbell shape in an orthogonal direction to allow for self-alignment in a confined flow, important for processing in flow and imaging flow cytometry. We designed a method to rapidly design, using the genetic algorithm, and manufacture the microcarriers at scale using a transient liquid molding optofluidic approach. The ability to precisely engineer the microcarriers solves fundamental challenges with shear-stress-induced cell damage during liquid-handling, and is poised to enable adherent cell culture, in-flow analysis, and sorting in a single format.

Identifiers

PMID31057909
PMCPMC6220171
OpenAlexW2883949847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.