ReviewMicrosystems & nanoengineering2017
State-of-the-art MEMS and microsystem tools for brain research.
Review in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
74 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robust structural superlubric interfaces under high current density, from understandings to applications.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Article
- Optimizing electrode placement and information capacity for local field potentials in cortex.NeuroImage · 2026Article
- Advancing neural interfaces: a framework for the fabrication and characterization of freestanding micro-nanodevices.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Article
- A Translational Platform for Polyimide Neural Interfaces: Polyimide Synthesis and in Vivo Evaluation in Epileptic Mice.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2026Article
- Sampling Probes Microfabricated from Parylene‑C for In Vivo Neurochemical Monitoring.ACS measurement science au · 2025Article
- Multi-Shank 1024 Channels Active SiNAPS Probe for Large Multi-Regional Topographical Electrophysiological Mapping of Neural Dynamics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- In vivo microelectrode arrays for neuroscience.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025Article
- Electroanatomy of hippocampal activity patterns: theta, gamma waves, sharp wave-ripples, and dentate spikes.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2025Article
- Simultaneous recording of neuronal discharge and calcium activity reveals claustrum-cortex neurosynchrony under anesthesia.Fundamental research · 2025Article
- Potential of Photoelectric Stimulation with Ultrasmall Carbon Electrode on Neural Tissue: New Directions in Neurostimulation Technology Development.Advanced functional materials · 2024Article
- Flexible multimaterial fibers in modern biomedical applications.National science review · 2024Review
- Linking brain activity across scales with simultaneous opto- and electrophysiology.Neurophotonics · 2024Review
- Multi-shank 1024 channels active SiNAPS probe for large multi-regional topographical electrophysiological mapping of neural dynamics.Research square · 2024Article
- Through-polymer, via technology-enabled, flexible, lightweight, and integrated devices for implantable neural probes.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2024Article
- Decrease in phase slip rates and phase cone structures during seizure evolution and epileptogenic activities derived from microgrid ECoG data.Current research in neurobiology · 2024Article
- Stable in-vivo electrochemical sensing of tonic serotonin levels using PEDOT/CNT-coated glassy carbon flexible microelectrode arrays.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2023Article
- Translational opportunities and challenges of invasive electrodes for neural interfaces.Nature biomedical engineering · 2023Review
- Post-explant profiling of subcellular-scale carbon fiber intracortical electrodes and surrounding neurons enables modeling of recorded electrophysiology.Journal of neural engineering · 2023Article
- Article
- A Review: Research Progress of Neural Probes for Brain Research and Brain-Computer Interface.Biosensors · 2022Review
14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mapping brain activity has received growing worldwide interest because it is expected to improve disease treatment and allow for the development of important neuromorphic computational methods. MEMS and microsystems are expected to continue to offer new and exciting solutions to meet the need for high-density, high-fidelity neural interfaces. Herein, the state-of-the-art in recording and stimulation tools for brain research is reviewed, and some of the most significant technology trends shaping the field of neurotechnology are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.