Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31057593›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2019

Contrasting Effects of Wild

Ana Paula Zotta Mota, Thais Nicolini Oliveira, Christina Cleo Vinson, Thomas Christopher Rhys Williams, Marcos Mota do Carmo Costa, Ana Claudia Guerra Araujo, Etienne G J Danchin, Maria Fatima Grossi-de-Sá, Patricia Messenberg Guimaraes, Ana Cristina Miranda Brasileiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ethylene Signaling Modulates Dehydrin Expression inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The genusFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ana Paula Zotta MotaEMBRAPA Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, Brazil.
Thais Nicolini OliveiraEMBRAPA Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, Brazil.
Christina Cleo VinsonEMBRAPA Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, Brazil.
Thomas Christopher Rhys WilliamsDepartamento de Botânica, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Marcos Mota do Carmo CostaEMBRAPA Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, Brazil.
Ana Claudia Guerra AraujoEMBRAPA Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, Brazil.
Etienne G J DanchinINRA, Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, ISA, Sophia-Antipolis, France.
Maria Fatima Grossi-de-SáEMBRAPA Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, Brazil.
Patricia Messenberg GuimaraesEMBRAPA Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, Brazil.
Ana Cristina Miranda BrasileiroEMBRAPA Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant dehydrins (DNHs) belong to the LEA (Late Embryogenesis Abundant) protein family and are involved in responses to multiple abiotic stresses. DHNs are classified into five subclasses according to the organization of three conserved motifs (K-; Y-; and S-segments). In the present study, the DHN protein family was characterized by molecular phylogeny, exon/intron organization, protein structure, and tissue-specificity expression in eight Fabaceae species. We identified 20 DHN genes, encompassing three (Y

Indexed as

Arabidopsisdroughtfreezinggenome-wideMeloidogyneroot-knot nematode

Identifiers

PMID31057593
PMCPMC6482428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.