Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31057348›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019

Robust Motion Regression of Resting-State Data Using a Convolutional Neural Network Model.

Zhengshi Yang, Xiaowei Zhuang, Karthik Sreenivasan, Virendra Mishra, Dietmar Cordes, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Predictive Coding and Internal Error Correction in Speech Production.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023
    Article
  6. Functional MRI in major depressive disorder: A review of findings, limitations, and future prospects.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhengshi YangCleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas, NV, United States.
Xiaowei ZhuangCleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas, NV, United States.
Karthik SreenivasanCleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas, NV, United States.
Virendra MishraCleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas, NV, United States.
Dietmar CordesCleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas, NV, United States.
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
Renewal of Centers of Biomedical Research Excellence (COBRE) (Phase 2) CNTN - ResubmissionP20GM109025 · NIGMS · CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION · PI JESSICA KIRKLAND CALDWELL · 2015 to 2026
$22.8M
Improving the Detection of Activation in High Resolution fMRI using MultivariateR01EB014284 · NIBIB · TORONTO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY · PI CORDES, DIETMAR · 2013 to 2015
$750k
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB014284NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) based on the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal has been widely used in healthy individuals and patients to investigate brain functions when the subjects are in a resting or task-negative state. Head motion considerably confounds the interpretation of rs-fMRI data. Nuisance regression is commonly used to reduce motion-related artifacts with six motion parameters estimated from rigid-body realignment as regressors. To further compensate for the effect of head movement, the first-order temporal derivatives of motion parameters and squared motion parameters were proposed previously as possible motion regressors. However, these additional regressors may not be sufficient to model the impact of head motion because of the complexity of motion artifacts. In addition, while using more motion-related regressors could explain more variance in the data, the neural signal may also be removed with increasing number of motion regressors. To better model how in-scanner motion affects rs-fMRI data, a robust and automated convolutional neural network (CNN) model is developed in this study to obtain optimal motion regressors. The CNN network consists of two temporal convolutional layers and the output from the network are the derived motion regressors used in the following nuisance regression. The temporal convolutional layer in the network can non-parametrically model the prolonged effect of head motion. The set of regressors derived from the neural network is compared with the same number of regressors used in a traditional nuisance regression approach. It is demonstrated that the CNN-derived regressors can more effectively reduce motion-related artifacts.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networkdenoisingfMRImotion artifactnuisance regression

Identifiers

PMID31057348
PMCPMC6482337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.