Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31057282›Full record

ArticleJournal of emergencies, trauma, and shock

Changing Aspects in the Management of Splenic Injury Patients: Experience of 129 Isolated Splenic Injury Patients at Level 1 Trauma Center from India.

Dinesh Bagaria, Atish Kumar, Amulya Ratan, Amit Gupta, Abhinav Kumar, Subodh Kumar, Biplab Mishra, Sushma Sagar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dinesh BagariaJPN Apex Trauma Center, Division of Trauma Surgery and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Atish KumarJPN Apex Trauma Center, Division of Trauma Surgery and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Amulya RatanJPN Apex Trauma Center, Division of Trauma Surgery and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Amit GuptaJPN Apex Trauma Center, Division of Trauma Surgery and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Abhinav KumarJPN Apex Trauma Center, Division of Trauma Surgery and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Subodh KumarJPN Apex Trauma Center, Division of Trauma Surgery and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Biplab MishraJPN Apex Trauma Center, Division of Trauma Surgery and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sushma SagarJPN Apex Trauma Center, Division of Trauma Surgery and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe spleen is most the commonly injured solid organ in abdominal trauma. Operative management (OM) has been challenged by several studies favoring successful non-OM (NOM) aided by modern era interventional radiology. The results of these studies are confounded by associated injuries impacting outcome. The aim of this study is to compare NOM and OM for isolated splenic injury in an Indian Level 1 Trauma Center. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis is a retrospective analysis of prospective database.

resultsA total of 1496 patients were admitted with abdominal injuries. One hundred and twenty-nine patients admitted with diagnosis of isolated splenic injury from January 2009 to December 2016 were included in the study. RTIs, followed by falls from height, were the most common mechanisms of injury. Ninety-two (71.3%) patients with isolated splenic trauma were successfully managed nonoperatively. Thirty-seven (28.7%) required surgery, of which three were due to the failure of NOM. Three patients in the nonoperative group underwent splenectomy later, giving an overall success rate of 96.8% for NOM. Patients with isolated splenic trauma requiring OM had higher grade splenic injury (Grade 4/5), higher blood transfusion requirements (

conclusionAlthough NOM is successful in most patients with blunt isolated splenic injuries, careful selection is the most important factor dictating the success of NOM.

Indexed as

Blunt splenic injurynonoperative managementoperative managementspleensplenectomy

Identifiers

PMID31057282
PMCPMC6496992
OpenAlexW2947603005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.