Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31057143›Full record

ArticleParasitology2019

Participation of Trypanosoma cruzi gp63 molecules on the interaction with Rhodnius prolixus.

Karina M Rebello, Livia A Uehara, Vítor Ennes-Vidal, Aline S Garcia-Gomes, Constança Britto, Patrícia Azambuja, Rubem F S Menna-Barreto, André L S Santos, Marta H Branquinha, Claudia M d'Avila-Levy

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Differences in Charge Distribution inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Biological and Molecular Effects ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Karina M RebelloLaboratório de Estudos Integrados em Protozoologia,Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC),Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ),Rio de Janeiro,Brazil.
Livia A UeharaLaboratório de Estudos Integrados em Protozoologia,Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC),Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ),Rio de Janeiro,Brazil.
Vítor Ennes-VidalLaboratório de Estudos Integrados em Protozoologia,Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC),Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ),Rio de Janeiro,Brazil.
Aline S Garcia-GomesLaboratório de Estudos Integrados em Protozoologia,Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC),Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ),Rio de Janeiro,Brazil.
Constança BrittoLaboratório de Biologia Molecular e Doenças Endêmicas,Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC),Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ),Rio de Janeiro, RJ,Brazil.
Patrícia AzambujaLaboratório de Bioquímica e Fisiologia de Insetos,Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC),Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ),Rio de Janeiro,Brazil.
Rubem F S Menna-BarretoLaboratório de Biologia Celular,Instituto Oswaldo Cruz,Fundação Oswaldo Cruz,Rio de Janeiro,Brazil.
André L S SantosLaboratório de Estudos Avançados de Microrganismos Emergentes e Resistência,Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro,Rio de Janeiro,Brazil.
Marta H BranquinhaLaboratório de Estudos Avançados de Microrganismos Emergentes e Resistência,Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro,Rio de Janeiro,Brazil.
Claudia M d'Avila-LevyLaboratório de Estudos Integrados em Protozoologia,Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC),Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ),Rio de Janeiro,Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8042-4695
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRde Duve Institute · BEInstituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trypanosoma cruzi is the causative agent of Chagas disease, a vector-borne disease. The parasite molecules involved in vector interaction have been little investigated. Metallopeptidases and gp63 molecules have been implicated in parasite adhesion of several trypanosomatids to the insect midgut. Although gp63 homologues are highly expanded in the T. cruzi genome, and are implicated in parasite-mammalian host interaction, its role in the insect vector has never been explored. Here, we showed that divalent metal chelators or anti-Tcgp63-I antibodies impaired T. cruzi adhesion to Rhodnius prolixus midgut. Parasites isolated after insect colonization presented a drastic enhancement in the expression of Tcgp63-I. These data highlight, for the first time, that Tcgp63-I and Zn-dependent enzymes contribute to the interaction of T. cruzi with the insect vector.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanChagas DiseaseHost-Parasite InteractionsInsect VectorsMetalloendopeptidasesProtozoan ProteinsRhodniusTrypanosoma cruziAntibodies, ProtozoanMetalloendopeptidasesProtozoan ProteinsInsectinvertebrate hostleishmanolysinmajor surface peptidase (MSP)triatominevector

Identifiers

PMID31057143
PMCPMC6604109
OpenAlexW2944530683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.