ArticleVirulence2019
Of mice and men: Interaction of Corynebacterium diphtheriae strains with murine and human phagocytes.
Article in Virulence, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A multiomic approach to defining the essential genome of the globally important pathogen Corynebacterium diphtheriae.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- Interactions between the Re-Emerging PathogenInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Corynebacterium rouxii, a recently described member of the C. diphtheriae group isolated from three dogs with ulcerative skin lesions.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2021Article
- Newly Isolated Animal PathogenInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Article
- Live cell imaging of macrophage/bacterium interaction demonstrates cell lysis induced by Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Corynebacterium ulcerans.BMC research notes · 2019Article
- Induction of Necrosis in Human Macrophage Cell Lines byInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Seven non-toxigenic C. diphtheriae strains and one toxigenic strain were analyzed with regard to their interaction with murine macrophages (BMM) and human THP-1 macrophage-like cells. Proliferation assays with BMM and THP-1 revealed similar intracellular CFUs for C. diphtheriae strains independent of the host cell. Strain ISS4060 showed highest intracellular CFUs, while the toxigenic DSM43989 was almost not detectable. This result was confirmed by TLR 9 reporter assays, showing a low signal for DSM43989, indicating that the bacteria are not endocytosed. In contrast, the non-pathogenic C. glutamicum showed almost no intracellular CFUs independent of the host cell, but was recognized by TLR9, indicating that the bacteria were degraded immediately after endocytosis. In terms of G-CSF and IL-6 production, no significant differences between BMM and THP-1 were observed. G-CSF production was considerably higher than IL-6 for all C. diphtheriae strains and the C. glutamicum did not induce high cytokine secretion in general. Furthermore, all corynebacteria investigated in this study were able to induce NFκB signaling but only viable C. diphtheriae strains were able to cause host cell damage, whereas C. glutamicum did not. The absence of Mincle resulted in reduced G-CSF production, while no influence on the uptake of the bacteria was observed. In contrast, when MyD88 was absent, both the uptake of the bacteria and cytokine production were blocked. Consequently, phagocytosis only occurs when the TLR/MyD88 pathway is functional, which was also supported by showing that all corynebacteria used in this study interact with human TLR2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.