Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31056718›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2019

Comprehensive cardiac phenotyping in large animals: comparison of pressure-volume analysis and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in pig post-myocardial infarction systolic heart failure.

Philip W J Raake, Jens Barthelmes, Birgit Krautz, Sebastian Buss, Regina Huditz, Philipp Schlegel, Christophe Weber, Manfred Stangassinger, Uwe Haberkorn, Hugo A Katus and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Philip W J RaakeDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. philip.raake@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Jens BarthelmesDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Birgit KrautzDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sebastian BussDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Regina HuditzDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Philipp SchlegelDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christophe WeberDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Manfred StangassingerInstitute for Animal Physiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Uwe HaberkornDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hugo A KatusDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Patrick MostDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sven T PlegerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft PM 562/1-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft RA 1668/3-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft RA 1668/6-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large animal ischemic cardiomyopathy models are widely used for preclinical testing of promising novel therapeutic approaches. Pressure volume (PV) loop analysis and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) allow functional and morphological phenotyping. In this study we performed a comparative analysis of both methods highlighting the strength of each and their synergistic potential. Myocardial infarction (MI) was created in German farm pigs (German Landrace) by 2 h LCX occlusion (n = 11) and subsequent reperfusion. Cardiac function was assessed by PV-loops and CMRI 56 and 112 days post-MI. Two hours occlusion of the LCX led to mid-size left ventricular (LV) MI represented by high-sensitive troponin T (hsTnT) 3 days post-MI, correlating well with cardiac CMRI late enhancement. CMRI determined end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes significantly increased post-MI, while ejection fraction was reduced in infarcted animals compared to the sham group (n = 6). PV-loop derived preload-insensitive parameters of systolic and diastolic function were diminished post-MI compared to sham animals while preload-dependent parameters only deteriorated in advanced HF. PV-loop analysis significantly correlates with CMRI analysis of cardiac function in pig post-MI ischemic cardiomyopathy. PV-Loop analysis accurately quantifies LV volumetry and function in post-MI HF, and thus eccentric LV morphology. PV-loop analysis correlates well to cardiac MRI. Preload-insensitive parameters show high sensitivity to quantify HF while preload-sensitive parameters are not able to quantify early-stages of LV HF.

Indexed as

Cardiac CatheterizationMagnetic Resonance ImagingStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftVentricular RemodelingAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalDisease ProgressionFemaleHeart Failure, SystolicMaleMyocardial InfarctionPhenotypePredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsSus scrofaCardiac functionCardiac magnetic resonance imagingHeart failureIschemic cardiomyopathyPig modelPressure–volume loops

Identifiers

PMID31056718
OpenAlexW2944407600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.