Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31056348›Full record

Trial reportClinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia2019

Oral MEK 1/2 Inhibitor Trametinib in Combination With AKT Inhibitor GSK2141795 in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia With RAS Mutations: A Phase II Study.

Brittany Knick Ragon, Olatoyosi Odenike, Maria R Baer, Wendy Stock, Gautam Borthakur, Keyur Patel, Lina Han, Helen Chen, Helen Ma, Loren Joseph and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Targeting CCL2/CCR2 Signaling Overcomes MEK Inhibitor Resistance in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Brittany Knick RagonDepartment of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC.
Olatoyosi OdenikeDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Maria R BaerUniversity of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD.
Wendy StockDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Gautam BorthakurDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Keyur PatelDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Lina HanDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Helen ChenCancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Helen MaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Loren JosephDivision of Clinical Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Yang ZhaoDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Keith BaggerlyDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Marina KonoplevaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Nitin JainDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Electronic address: njain@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Chicago Medical Center · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USLevine Cancer Institute · USNational Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Functional Proteomics by Reverse Phase Protein Array in CancerR50CA221675 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LU, YILING · 2017 to 2021
$726k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R50 CA221675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith proven single-agent activity and favorable toxicity profile of MEK-1/2 inhibition in advanced leukemia, investigation into combination strategies to overcome proposed resistance pathways is warranted. Resistance to MEK inhibition is secondary to upstream hyperactivation of RAS/RAF or activation of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT/mTOR pathway. This phase II multi-institution Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program-sponsored study was conducted to determine efficacy and safety of the combination of the ATP-competitive pan-AKT inhibitor GSK2141795, targeting the PI3K/AKT pathway, and the MEK inhibitor trametinib in RAS-mutated relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). PATIENTS AND

methodsThe primary objective was to determine the proportion of patients achieving a complete remission. Secondary objectives included assessment of toxicity profile and biologic effects of this combination. Twenty-three patients with RAS-mutated AML received the combination. Two dose levels were explored (dose level 1: 2 mg trametinib, 25 mg GSK2141795 and dose level 2: 1.5 mg trametinib, 50 mg GSK2141795).

resultsDose level 1 was identified as the recommended phase II dose. No complete remissions were identified in either cohort. Minor responses were recognized in 5 (22%) patients. The most common drug-related toxicities included rash and diarrhea, with dose-limiting toxicities of mucositis and colitis. Longitudinal correlative assessment of the modulation of MEK and AKT pathways using reverse phase protein array and phospho-flow analysis revealed significant and near significant down-modulation of pERK and pS6, respectively. Combined MEK and AKT inhibition had no clinical activity in patients with RAS-mutated AML.

conclusionFurther investigation is required to explore the discrepancy between the activity of this combination on leukemia cells and the lack of clinical efficacy.

Indexed as

Genes, rasMutationAdministration, OralAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDiaminesFemaleHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMAP Kinase Kinase 1MAP Kinase Kinase 2Middle AgedProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktDiaminesGSK2141795MAP2K1 protein, humanMAP2K2 protein, humanMAP Kinase Kinase 1MAP Kinase Kinase 2Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktPyrazolesPyridonesPyrimidinonestrametinibAMLDevelopmental therapeuticsDrug resistanceNeoplasia-myeloid leukemias and dysplasiasPhase II clinical trials

Identifiers

PMID31056348
PMCPMC6626580
OpenAlexW2925169205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.