Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31055768›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2019

Intestinal gene expressions in broiler chickens infected with Escherichia coli and dietary supplemented with probiotic, acidifier and synbiotic.

Ahmed I Ateya, Nagah Arafat, Rasha M Saleh, Hanaa M Ghanem, Doaa Naguib, Hend A Radwan, Y Y Elseady

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Effects of probiotic (Veterinary world · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Pathogenesis-Related Gene Expression in Response toFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Microorganisms · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ahmed I AteyaDepartment of Animal Husbandry and Wealth Development, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.
Nagah ArafatDepartment of Poultry Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt. nagaharafat@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3126-7632
Rasha M SalehDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.
Hanaa M GhanemDepartment of Animal Husbandry and Wealth Development, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.
Doaa NaguibDepartment of Hygiene and Zoonoses, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.
Hend A RadwanDepartment of Animal Husbandry and Wealth Development, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.
Y Y ElseadyDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.
Mansoura University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the effects of probiotic, acidifier and synbiotic supplementation on growth performance, mortality rate, intestinal gene expressions, fecal shedding, and organs colonization induced by Escherichia coli in broiler chickens. Six experimental groups were included; negative control group (NC), positive control group (PC), probiotic group (PR), acidifier group (AC), synbiotic group (SY) and colistin sulfate group (CS). Chickens in groups NC and PC were fed a basal diet, while chickens in groups PR, AC, SY, and CS were fed a basal diet containing probiotic, acidifier, synbiotic and colistin sulfate, respectively from the 1st day to the 28th day of age. At 7 days of age, all groups (not NC) were orally challenged with 0.5 ml (1.0 × 10

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAnimalsChickensColistinEatingEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsGene Expression RegulationIntestinesPoultry DiseasesProbioticsSynbioticsWeight GainColistinAcidifiersBroilersEscherichia coliGene expressionsSynbiotic

Identifiers

PMID31055768
OpenAlexW2944010236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.