ReviewBiophysical reviews2019
"Force-From-Lipids" mechanosensation in Corynebacterium glutamicum.
Review in Biophysical reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Membrane manipulation by free fatty acids improves microbial plant polyphenol synthesis.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Application of Corynebacterium glutamicum engineering display system in three generations of biorefinery.Microbial cell factories · 2022Review
- Review
- Essentiality of c-di-AMP in Bacillus subtilis: Bypassing mutations converge in potassium and glutamate homeostasis.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Genome-Scale Mining of Novel Anchor Proteins ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Membrane transporters in the bioproduction of organic acids: state of the art and future perspectives for industrial applications.FEMS microbiology letters · 2020Review
- Contribution of mechanosensitive channels to osmoadaptation and ectoine excretion in Halomonas elongata.Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2020Article
- Editorial: Special issue of Biophysical Reviews dedicated to the joint 10th Asian Biophysics Association Symposium and 42nd Australian Society for Biophysics Meeting, Melbourne, Australia, December 2-6, 2018.Biophysical reviews · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the mechanosensitive channel MscCG has been identified as the major glutamate efflux system in Corynebacterium glutamicum, studies of mechanotransduction processes in this bacterium have helped to unpuzzle a long-unresolved mystery of glutamate efflux that has been utilised for industrial monosodium glutamate production. The patch clamp recording from C. glutamicum giant spheroplasts revealed the existence of three types of mechanosensitive (MS) channels in the cell membrane of this bacterium. The experiments demonstrated that the MS channels could be activated by membrane tension, indicating that the channel gating by mechanical force followed the "Force-From-Lipids (FFL)" principle characteristic of ion channels inherently sensitive to transbilayer pressure profile changes in the mechanically stressed membrane bilayer. Mechanical properties of the C. glutamicum membrane are characteristics of very soft membranes, which in the C. glutamicum membrane are due to negatively charged lipids as its exclusive constituents. Given that membrane lipids are significantly altered during the fermentation process in the monosodium glutamate production, MS channels seem to respond to changes in force transmission through the membrane bilayer due to membrane lipid dynamics. In this review, we describe the recent results describing corynebacterial FFL-dependent mechanosensation originating from the particular lipid composition of the C. glutamicum membrane and unique structure of MscCG-type channels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.