ReviewCurrent nutrition reports2019
Vitamin D
Review in Current nutrition reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vitamin D and Ovarian Cancer: Systematic Review of the Literature with a Focus on Molecular Mechanisms.Cells · 2020Pooled it
- Vitamin D₃ in cancer prevention and therapy: molecular mechanisms, clinical evidence, and future perspectives.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Article
- The role of vitamin D deficiency in the development of paediatric diseases.Annals of medicine · 2023Review
- Vitamin D modulation and microRNAs in gastric cancer: prognostic and therapeutic role.Translational cancer research · 2021Review
- Vitamin D testing: advantages and limits of the current assays.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2020Review
- Linking the metabolic syndrome and obesity with vitamin D status: risks and opportunities for improving cardiometabolic health and well-being.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2019Article
- Assessment of vitamin D levels in patients with oral potentially malignant disorders and oral squamous cell carcinoma-A cross-sectional study.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review summarizes the understanding of vitamin D RECENT
findingsRecent randomized clinical trials and observational studies of participants who took part in vitamin D
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.