Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31055654›Full record

ReviewMikrochimica acta2019

Dengue virus: a review on advances in detection and trends - from conventional methods to novel biosensors.

Reza Eivazzadeh-Keihan, Paria Pashazadeh-Panahi, Tohid Mahmoudi, Karim Khanmohammadi Chenab, Behzad Baradaran, Mahmoud Hashemzaei, Fateme Radinekiyan, Ahad Mokhtarzadeh, Ali Maleki

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Mikrochimica acta, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Electrochemical biosensor detection on respiratory and flaviviruses.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Reza Eivazzadeh-KeihanCatalysts and Organic Synthesis Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, 16846-13114, Iran.
Paria Pashazadeh-PanahiDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Metabolic Disorders Research Center, Gorgan Faculty of Medicine, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Golestan Province, Iran.
Tohid MahmoudiImmunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Karim Khanmohammadi ChenabCatalysts and Organic Synthesis Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, 16846-13114, Iran.
Behzad BaradaranImmunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Mahmoud HashemzaeiDepartment of Pharmacodynamics and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran.
Fateme RadinekiyanCatalysts and Organic Synthesis Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, 16846-13114, Iran.
Ahad MokhtarzadehImmunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. ahad.mokhtarzadeh@gmail.com.
Ali MalekiCatalysts and Organic Synthesis Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, 16846-13114, Iran. maleki@iust.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dengue virus is an important arbovirus infection which transmitted by the Aedes female mosquitoes. The attempt to control and early detection of this infection is a global public health issue at present. Because of the clinical importance of its detection, the main focus of this review is on all of the methods that can offer the new diagnosis strategies. The advantages and disadvantages of reported methods have been discussed comprehensively from different aspects like biomarkers type, sensitivity, accuracy, rate of detection, possibility of commercialization, availability, limit of detection, linear range, simplicity, mechanism of detection, and ability of usage for clinical applications. The optical, electrochemical, microfluidic, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and smartphone-based biosensors are the main approaches which developed for detection of different biomarkers and serotypes of Dengue virus. Future efforts in miniaturization of these methods open the horizons for development of commercial biosensors for early-diagnosis of Dengue virus infection. Graphical abstract Transmission of Dengue virus by the biting of an Aedes aegypti mosquito, the symptoms of Dengue hemorrhagic fever and the structure of Dengue virus and application of biosensors for its detection.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBiosensing TechniquesDengue VirusElectrochemical TechniquesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionSmartphoneBiomarkersBiomarkerBiosensorClinical applicationsDengue virusImmunosensorLimit of detectionSerotype

Identifiers

PMID31055654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.