Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31055625›Full record

Observational studyWorld journal of urology2020

Improved detection and reduced biopsies: the effect of a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based triage prostate cancer pathway in a public teaching hospital.

Peter Donato, Andrew Morton, John Yaxley, Patrick E Teloken, Geoff Coughlin, Rachel Esler, Nigel Dunglison, Robert A Gardiner, Matthew J Roberts

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in World journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peter DonatoDepartment of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Andrew MortonDepartment of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
John YaxleyDepartment of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Patrick E TelokenDepartment of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Geoff CoughlinDepartment of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Rachel EslerDepartment of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Nigel DunglisonDepartment of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Robert A GardinerDepartment of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Matthew J RobertsDepartment of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. m.roberts2@uq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0552-7402
The University of Queensland · AURoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AUGriffith University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMultiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) improves clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection by facilitating targeted biopsy (cognitive, fusion technology, or in-gantry MRI guidance) and reducing negative biopsies. This study sought to describe the feasibility of introducing an mpMRI-based triage pathway, including diagnostic performance, applicability to training, and cost analysis.

methodsAn observational retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients attending a large public tertiary referral training hospital who underwent mpMRI for suspicion of prostate cancer was considered. Standard clinical, MRI-related, histopathological, and financial parameters were collected for analysis of biopsy avoidance, diagnostic accuracy of biopsy approach, and operator (consultant and resident/registrar) and logistical (including financial) feasibility.

results653 men underwent mpMRI, of which 344 underwent prostate biopsy resulting in a 47% biopsy avoidance rate. Overall, 240 (69.8%) patients were diagnosed with PCa, of which 208 (60.5%) were clinically significant, with higher rates of csPCa observed for higher PIRADS scores. In patients who underwent both systematic and targeted biopsy (stTPB), targeted cores detected csPCa in 12.7% and 16.6% in more men than systematic cores in PIRADS 5 and 4, respectively, whereas systematic cores detected csPCa in 5% and 3.2% of patients, where targeted cores did not. A high standard of performance was maintained across the study period and the approach was shown to be cost effective.

conclusionsIntrodution of an mpMRI-based triage system into a large public tertiary teaching hospital is feasible, cost effective and leads to high rates of prostate cancer diagnosis while reducing unnecessary biopsies and detection of insignificant PCa.

Indexed as

Hospitals, PublicHospitals, TeachingAgedAged, 80 and overFollow-Up StudiesHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstateProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesTriageCognitive-fusion prostate biopsyMultiparametric MRIProstate cancerProstate imaging reporting and data systemSystematic prostate biopsyTransperineal prostate biopsy

Identifiers

PMID31055625
OpenAlexW2944793249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.