Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31054276›Full record

ArticleAppetite2019

Exploratory factor analysis of The Comprehensive Feeding Practices Questionnaire (CFPQ) in a low-income hispanic sample of preschool aged children.

Katherine R Arlinghaus, Daphne C Hernandez, Sally G Eagleton, Tzu-An Chen, Thomas G Power, Sheryl O Hughes

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Appetite, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. General Parenting and Hispanic Mothers' Feeding Practices and Styles.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katherine R ArlinghausUniversity of Houston, Department of Health & Human Performance, 3875 Holman Street, Garrison Gymnasium, Room 104, Houston, TX, 77240, USA. Electronic address: krarlinghaus@uh.edu.
Daphne C HernandezUniversity of Houston, Department of Health & Human Performance, 3875 Holman Street, Garrison Gymnasium, Room 104, Houston, TX, 77240, USA; HEALTH Research Institute, University of Houston, Health 2, 3839 Calhoun Road, Houston, TX, 77204, USA. Electronic address: dhernandez26@uh.edu.
Sally G EagletonCenter for Childhood Obesity Research, Penn State College of Health and Human Development, University Park, PA, USA; Department of Nutritional Sciences, Penn State College of Health and Human Development, University Park, PA, USA. Electronic address: sge5@psu.edu.
Tzu-An ChenHEALTH Research Institute, University of Houston, Health 2, 3839 Calhoun Road, Houston, TX, 77204, USA. Electronic address: tchen38@uh.edu.
Thomas G PowerDepartment of Human Development, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA. Electronic address: tompower@wsu.edu.
Sheryl O HughesUSDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, 1100 Bates Ave, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. Electronic address: shughes@bcm.edu.

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002014 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI KRASCHNEWSKI, JENNIFER L. · 2016 to 2025
$33.7M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002016 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI THOMAS, GAIL D. · 2016 to 2025
$3.4M
Parenting Influences on Child Self-Regulation, Energy Intake, and WeightR01HD062567 · NICHD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI HUGHES, SHERYL O · 2010 to 2015
$2.4M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002016NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002014NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD062567
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Comprehensive Feeding Practices Questionnaire (CFPQ) is an important measure to assess parent feeding practices as it encompasses a broad range of feeding behaviors, not just behaviors negatively associated with child weight outcomes. However, parent feeding practices have been shown to differ across ethnicities and the CFPQ has not been tested among low-income, Hispanic-American parents with preschool-aged children, a group at elevated risk for developing obesity. A confirmatory factor analysis was performed with the present Hispanic-American sample of Head Start mothers with preschoolers to confirm the original 12-factor, 49-item structure of the CFPQ. Because the original factor structure was not confirmed in the present Hispanic-American sample, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted to examine the psychometric properties of the CFPQ in this sample (n = 187). Among this sample, a five-factor model with 34 items was found to more appropriately assess parent feeding practices than the original 12-factor, 49-item CFPQ. This study provides preliminary validation of the CFPQ for use among low income, Hispanic-American families. Although future research is needed to replicate findings among a larger sample, this study takes an important first step toward more accurately assessing parent feeding practices among this high-risk population to inform tailored interventions that aim to reduce economic and ethnic disparities in child obesity.

Indexed as

AdultChild, PreschoolFactor Analysis, StatisticalFeeding BehaviorFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleMothersParent-Child RelationsParentingPovertyPsychometricsSurveys and QuestionnairesExploratory factor analysisHispanicLow-incomeParent feeding practicesPreschool

Identifiers

PMID31054276
PMCPMC8358830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.