ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2019
Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge 2018 (MATCH)-phase II: rupture risk assessment.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intracranial aneurysm CTA images and 3D models dataset with clinical morphological and hemodynamic data.Scientific data · 2024Article
- On flow fluctuations in ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms: resolved numerical study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Multimodal exploration of the intracranial aneurysm wall.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023Article
- Is Accurate Lumen Segmentation More Important than Outlet Boundary Condition in Image-Based Blood Flow Simulations for Intracranial Aneurysms?Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2023Article
- Reproducibility of the computational fluid dynamic analysis of a cerebral aneurysm monitored over a decade.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Global tendencies and frontier topics in hemodynamics research of intracranial aneurysms: a bibliometric analysis from 1999 to 2022.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Morphological and Hemodynamic Changes during Cerebral Aneurysm Growth.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Effect of macro-calcification on the failure mechanics of intracranial aneurysmal wall tissue.Experimental mechanics · 2021Article
- U-Shaped Association of Aspect Ratio and Single Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture in Chinese Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Combining visual analytics and case-based reasoning for rupture risk assessment of intracranial aneurysms.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2020Article
- Hemodynamics of Cerebral Aneurysms: Connecting Medical Imaging and Biomechanical Analysis.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2020Review
- A novel virtual flow diverter implantation method with realistic deployment mechanics and validated force response.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2020Article
- Computational Hemodynamic Modeling of Arterial Aneurysms: A Mini-Review.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Review
- Interactive exploration of a 3D intracranial aneurysm wall model extracted from histologic slices.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2020Article
- Novel Models for Identification of the Ruptured Aneurysm in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage with Multiple Aneurysms.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2019Article
- Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge 2018 (MATCH)-Phase Ib: Effect of morphology on hemodynamics.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
44 authors at 20 institutions in 11 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAssessing the rupture probability of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) remains challenging. Therefore, hemodynamic simulations are increasingly applied toward supporting physicians during treatment planning. However, due to several assumptions, the clinical acceptance of these methods remains limited.
methodsTo provide an overview of state-of-the-art blood flow simulation capabilities, the Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge 2018 (MATCH) was conducted. Seventeen research groups from all over the world performed segmentations and hemodynamic simulations to identify the ruptured aneurysm in a patient harboring five IAs. Although simulation setups revealed good similarity, clear differences exist with respect to the analysis of aneurysm shape and blood flow results. Most groups (12/71%) included morphological and hemodynamic parameters in their analysis, with aspect ratio and wall shear stress as the most popular candidates, respectively.
resultsThe majority of groups (7/41%) selected the largest aneurysm as being the ruptured one. Four (24%) of the participating groups were able to correctly select the ruptured aneurysm, while three groups (18%) ranked the ruptured aneurysm as the second most probable. Successful selections were based on the integration of clinically relevant information such as the aneurysm site, as well as advanced rupture probability models considering multiple parameters. Additionally, flow characteristics such as the quantification of inflow jets and the identification of multiple vortices led to correct predictions.
conclusionsMATCH compares state-of-the-art image-based blood flow simulation approaches to assess the rupture risk of IAs. Furthermore, this challenge highlights the importance of multivariate analyses by combining clinically relevant metadata with advanced morphological and hemodynamic quantification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.