Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31054061›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2019

Characteristic of drug-related problems and pharmacists' interventions in a stroke unit in Thailand.

Kannikar Semcharoen, Sajja Supornpun, Surakit Nathisuwan, Junporn Kongwatcharapong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kannikar SemcharoenDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Sajja SupornpunDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Surakit NathisuwanDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Junporn KongwatcharapongDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand. jkwatcharapong@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Little information is available regarding pharmacist's intervention to solve drug-related problems (DRPs) in a stroke unit. Objective To investigate the nature and frequency of DRPs along with the role of pharmacists in a stroke unit. Setting The study was conducted at the stroke unit of Siriraj hospital, a university affiliated tertiary care hospital in Thailand. Method A retrospective descriptive study of DRPs and pharmacists' interventions for stroke patients was performed during July 2015 to December 2016. Data were collected from patient's medical records and pharmacist's intervention record forms. DRPs were categorized using the Hepler-Strand classification. The stroke pharmacist team, consisting of a board-certified pharmacotherapy specialist, neurology pharmacy residents and stroke unit pharmacists, participated in the multidisciplinary ward round in the stroke unit 5 days a week. All patients were visited by a member of the stroke pharmacist team within the first two days of their admission to conduct a thorough review of drug therapy for every patient and provided appropriate recommendation to the multidisciplinary team either verbally during the ward round or with written information in the patients' medical charts, as appropriate. Main Outcome Measure (a) incidence and characteristics of DRPs (b) types and the acceptance of pharmacists' interventions. Results A total of 859 patients were admitted, of those, 768 patients had ≥ 1 DRPs and a total of 796 DRPs were identified. Clinical pharmacists provided 659 interventions to the multidisciplinary team. The most common DRPs identified were "untreated indications" (22.6%) and "non-compliance" (21.0%). Of all DRPs, 74.6% were stroke related issues. The most implicated drugs were antihypertensive drugs, followed by antithrombotic therapies. The multidisciplinary team accepted 84.7% of pharmacists' interventions. Conclusion DRP in a stroke unit is common. Clinical pharmacists in a stroke unit can effectively reduce and prevent DRPs with the focus on performing medication reconciliation, providing recommendation on dosage adjustment and proper drug selection for stroke patients.

Indexed as

PharmacistsProfessional RoleStrokeAgedDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansMaleMedication ErrorsMedication ReconciliationMiddle AgedPatient Care TeamPharmacy Service, HospitalRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care CentersThailandDrug-related problemsHospitalPharmacistPharmacist’s interventionStrokeThailand

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.