Trial reportAnnals of surgical oncology2019
A Randomized Trial Evaluating Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Versus Tape Measurement for the Prevention of Lymphedema Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis.
Trial report in Annals of surgical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of physical therapy for prevention and treatment of postoperative lymphedema in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- The impact of monitoring techniques on progression to chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema: a meta-analysis comparing bioimpedance spectroscopy versus circumferential measurements.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2021Pooled it
- The Importance of a Pre-treatment Baseline When Screening Patients for Breast-Cancer-Related Lymphedema.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Trial
- Axillary Treatment and Chronic Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Implications for Prospective Surveillance and Intervention From a Randomized Controlled Trial.JCO oncology practice · 2023Trial
- Prospective Surveillance with Compression for Subclinical Lymphedema: Symptoms, Skin, and Quality-of-Life Outcomes.Lymphatic research and biology · 2023Trial
- A Comparison of Bioimpedance Spectroscopy or Tape Measure Triggered Compression Intervention in Chronic Breast Cancer Lymphedema Prevention.Lymphatic research and biology · 2022Trial
- Trial
- L-Dex, arm volume, and symptom trajectories 24 months after breast cancer surgery.Cancer medicine · 2020Trial
- Can Resistance Training Prevent Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of a lymphedema prevention program for patients with breast cancer: A randomized controlled trial based on the Protection Motivation Theory and Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills Model.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Microsurgical treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema under contrast-enhanced ultrasound guidance: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Reliability of L-Dex Scores for Assessment of Unilateral Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.European journal of breast health · 2024Article
- Localised Objective Characterisation Assessment of Lymphoedema (LOCAL): Using High-Frequency Ultrasound, Bioelectrical Impedance Spectroscopy and Volume to Evaluate Superficial Tissue Composition.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) clinical practice guidance for the prevention of breast cancer-related arm lymphoedema (BCRAL): international Delphi consensus-based recommendations.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Comprehensive strategies in breast cancer-related lymphedema prevention: insights from a multifaceted program.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Bibliometric analysis of breast cancer-related lymphedema research trends over the last 2 decades.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (BCRL) and Bioimpedance Spectroscopy: Long-Term Follow-Up, Surveillance Recommendations, and Multidisciplinary Risk Factors.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Body mass index increases the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema at 6-18 months after surgery: a retrospective study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Article
- Under recognition and treatment of lymphedema in head and neck cancer survivors - a database study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Article
- Bioimpedance spectroscopy for breast cancer-related lymphedema assessment: clinical practice guidelines.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) represents a major source of morbidity among breast cancer survivors. Increasing data support early detection of subclinical BCRL followed by early intervention. A randomized controlled trial is being conducted comparing lymphedema progression rates using volume measurements calculated from the circumference using a tape measure (TM) or bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS).
methodsPatients were enrolled and randomized to either TM or BIS surveillance. Patients requiring early intervention were prescribed a compression sleeve and gauntlet for 4 weeks and then re-evaluated. The primary endpoint of the trial was the rate of progression to clinical lymphedema requiring complex decongestive physiotherapy (CDP), with progression defined as a TM volume change in the at-risk arm ≥ 10% above the presurgical baseline. This prespecified interim analysis was performed when at least 500 trial participants had ≥ 12 months of follow-up.
resultsA total of 508 patients were included in this analysis, with 109 (21.9%) patients triggering prethreshold interventions. Compared with TM, BIS had a lower rate of trigger (15.8% vs. 28.5%, p < 0.001) and longer times to trigger (9.5 vs. 2.8 months, p = 0.002). Twelve triggering patients progressed to CDP (10 in the TM group [14.7%] and 2 in the BIS group [4.9%]), representing a 67% relative reduction and a 9.8% absolute reduction (p = 0.130).
conclusionsInterim results demonstrated that post-treatment surveillance with BIS reduced the absolute rates of progression of BCRL requiring CDP by approximately 10%, a clinically meaningful improvement. These results support the concept of post-treatment surveillance with BIS to detect subclinical BCRL and initiate early intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.