Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31054028›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2019

Complex macrocycle exploration: parallel, heuristic, and constraint-based conformer generation using ForceGen.

Ajay N Jain, Ann E Cleves, Qi Gao, Xiao Wang, Yizhou Liu, Edward C Sherer, Mikhail Y Reibarkh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Discovery and Biosynthesis of a Structurally Dynamic Antibacterial Diterpenoid.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Structure-based drug repositioning over the human TMPRSS2 protease domain: search for chemical probes able to repress SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein cleavages.European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ajay N JainDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA. ajain@jainlab.org.ORCID 0000-0003-4641-8501
Ann E ClevesApplied Science, BioPharmics LLC, Santa Rosa, CA, USA.
Qi GaoProcess Research and Development, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Xiao WangProcess Research and Development, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Yizhou LiuProcess Research and Development, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Edward C ShererModeling and Informatics, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Mikhail Y ReibarkhProcess Research and Development, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. mikhail_reibarkh@merck.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ForceGen is a template-free, non-stochastic approach for 2D to 3D structure generation and conformational elaboration for small molecules, including both non-macrocycles and macrocycles. For conformational search of non-macrocycles, ForceGen is both faster and more accurate than the best of all tested methods on a very large, independently curated benchmark of 2859 PDB ligands. In this study, the primary results are on macrocycles, including results for 431 unique examples from four separate benchmarks. These include complex peptide and peptide-like cases that can form networks of internal hydrogen bonds. By making use of new physical movements ("flips" of near-linear sub-cycles and explicit formation of hydrogen bonds), ForceGen exhibited statistically significantly better performance for overall RMS deviation from experimental coordinates than all other approaches. The algorithmic approach offers natural parallelization across multiple computing-cores. On a modest multi-core workstation, for all but the most complex macrocycles, median wall-clock times were generally under a minute in fast search mode and under 2 min using thorough search. On the most complex cases (roughly cyclic decapeptides and larger) explicit exploration of likely hydrogen bonding networks yielded marked improvements, but with calculation times increasing to several minutes and in some cases to roughly an hour for fast search. In complex cases, utilization of NMR data to constrain conformational search produces accurate conformational ensembles representative of solution state macrocycle behavior. On macrocycles of typical complexity (up to 21 rotatable macrocyclic and exocyclic bonds), design-focused macrocycle optimization can be practically supported by computational chemistry at interactive time-scales, with conformational ensemble accuracy equaling what is seen with non-macrocyclic ligands. For more complex macrocycles, inclusion of sparse biophysical data is a helpful adjunct to computation.

Indexed as

HeuristicsHydrogen BondingLigandsMacrocyclic CompoundsMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyModels, MolecularMolecular ConformationPeptidesPeptides, CyclicLigandsMacrocyclic CompoundsPeptidesPeptides, CyclicConformer generationForceGenMacrocycleMulti-coreNMRRDCSurflex

Identifiers

PMID31054028
PMCPMC6554267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.