Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31054015›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2019

Application of tRNS to improve multiple sclerosis fatigue: a pilot, single-blind, sham-controlled study.

Giuseppe Salemi, Giulia Vazzoler, Paolo Ragonese, Alessia Bianchi, Giuseppe Cosentino, Giuseppe Croce, Massimo Gangitano, Erika Portera, Sabrina Realmuto, Brigida Fierro and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Giuseppe SalemiDepartment of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Via Gaetano La Loggia 1, 90129, Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3756-4323
Giulia VazzolerDepartment of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Via Gaetano La Loggia 1, 90129, Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4654-9387
Paolo RagoneseDepartment of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Via Gaetano La Loggia 1, 90129, Palermo, Italy. paolo.ragonese@unipa.it.ORCID 0000-0003-2516-1567
Alessia BianchiDepartment of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Via Gaetano La Loggia 1, 90129, Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5541-5818
Giuseppe CosentinoDepartment of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Via Gaetano La Loggia 1, 90129, Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0309-6410
Giuseppe CroceDepartment of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Via Gaetano La Loggia 1, 90129, Palermo, Italy.
Massimo GangitanoDepartment of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Via Gaetano La Loggia 1, 90129, Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1283-0645
Erika PorteraDepartment of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Via Gaetano La Loggia 1, 90129, Palermo, Italy.
Sabrina RealmutoDepartment of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Via Gaetano La Loggia 1, 90129, Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7563-6674
Brigida FierroDepartment of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Via Gaetano La Loggia 1, 90129, Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2137-6790
Filippo BrighinaDepartment of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Via Gaetano La Loggia 1, 90129, Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5875-3126

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated the effects of transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) on fatigue in 17 subjects with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with low physical disability. Two different patient groups underwent real or sham stimulation for 10 days, targeting the primary motor cortex of the dominant side or contralateral to the most compromised limb. In the 'real group', beneficial effects were observed using the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (p = 0.04; physical subscale: p = 0.03), the subscales 'change in health' (p = 0.006) and 'role limitations due to physical problems' (p = 0.001) of the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54, and by assessing the patient impression of perceived fatigue (p = 0.005).

Indexed as

Motor CortexOutcome Assessment, Health CareTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultFatigueFemaleHumansMaleMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingPlacebosQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexSingle-Blind MethodYoung AdultPlacebosFatigue treatmentMFISMSQoL-54Multiple sclerosisPrimary motor areatRNS

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.