Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31054006›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2019

Adjuvant Therapy Options in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Where Do We Stand?

Nieves Martinez Chanza, Abhishek Tripathi, Lauren C Harshman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nieves Martinez ChanzaLank Center for Genitourinary Cancers, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Ave (DANA 1230), Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Abhishek TripathiUniversity of Oklahoma Stephenson Cancer Center, 800 NE 10th St, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Lauren C HarshmanLank Center for Genitourinary Cancers, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Ave (DANA 1230), Boston, MA, 02215, USA. LaurenC_Harshman@dfci.harvard.edu.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USInstitut Jules Bordet · BEOklahoma State University Oklahoma City · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementAdjuvant therapy for non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains controversial. Of the four reported randomized controlled trials evaluating adjuvant vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition, only one met its primary endpoint. The S-TRAC study demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) of greater than 1 year with adjuvant sunitinib compared to placebo in patients with high-risk localized RCC and earned it FDA approval. However, the larger ASSURE study which reported first did not find a difference in DFS or overall survival between 1 year of adjuvant sunitinib or sorafenib compared to placebo. Given the discordant results of the two sunitinib studies, two other negative studies of adjuvant targeted therapy with pazopanib and axitinib, the lack of definite overall survival benefit in any study, and the high incidence of treatment-related adverse events with sunitinib, we do not recommend the routine use of adjuvant sunitinib. The decision to offer adjuvant sunitinib should be considered on an individual basis after an informed discussion of the potential toxicities and the risk/benefit ratio. Despite numerous efforts and recently published works, there is a paucity of prognostic and predictive molecular biomarkers in RCC. Further investigation is needed to discover new tools that can enhance the identification of patients who are most likely to benefit from adjuvant treatment beyond pathologic stage. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have great potential to significantly improve outcomes in high-risk localized RCC. Building on their established efficacy in the metastatic setting, several ongoing clinical trials are evaluating their value as single agents or in combination in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. At this time, we recommend participation in clinical trials as the preferred therapeutic option for patients with high-risk, non-metastatic RCC planned for nephrectomy.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellChemotherapy, AdjuvantClinical Trials as TopicCombined Modality TherapyDisease ManagementHumansKidney NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingAdjuvant immunotherapyAdjuvant therapyCheckpoint inhibitorsNeoadjuvant nivolumabPerioperative checkpoint blockadePROSPER RCCRenal cell carcinomaTargeted therapyVEGF inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID31054006
OpenAlexW2943615318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.