ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2019
Optimal sizing of roof gutters and hopper for rainwater harvesting.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bernoulli's equation was applied to a section of hopper collector to determine the appropriate dimensions of the hopper for rainwater harvesting. Also, the hopper surface area (SFA) for a given volume was minimized by differentiating it in relation to the slant angle (SA). Combining the rational formula-Manning's equation and the best hydraulic section criteria-expressions were obtained for the optimum sizes of rectangular and circular gutters. Minimum hopper SFA for a given volume was found to occur at an optimum hopper SA of 35.282°. With the optimum conditions, design charts were produced for the hopper, circular, and rectangular roof gutters. The ratio of hopper larger radius to the smaller radius designated as (α) gave hopper dimensions with excessively wide upper radius for values of 0.1 ≤ α ≤ 0.2. Alpha (α) values of 0.8 and 0.9 gave values of R and Z which are almost too close to be distinguished. The valid range of α for hopper design was found to be 0.292 ≤ α ≤ 0.8. The study revealed that roof plan area has more effect on hopper dimensions than gutter slope. In addition, the case of excessive long gutters can be addressed by placing the hopper at the lateral epicenter of the eaves. In this regard, regions with abundant rainfall can solve water scarcity issues if proper design parameters of RWH components are considered in order to avoid waste of water through the overflow of water collection systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31053983What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.