Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31053920›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of urology2020

Evolution of the surgical sealing patch TachoSil

Georgios Hatzichristodoulou

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. 50th year anniversary of penile implants: an ongoing worldwide triumph.International journal of impotence research · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Current trends in the surgical treatment of congenital penile curvature.International journal of impotence research · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Georgios HatzichristodoulouDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Julius-Maximilians-University of Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. hatzichris_g@ukw.de.
University of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study is to review the current literature that reports outcomes of Peyronie's disease (PD) reconstructive surgery using the collagen fleece TachoSil

methodsA literature review was performed through PubMed between 2013 and 2018 regarding the use of TachoSil

resultsGrafting procedures are indicated for men with PD and preserved erectile function. TachoSil

conclusionsThe TachoSil

Indexed as

Penile ProsthesisSuture TechniquesHumansMalePenile ErectionPenile ImplantationPenile IndurationPlastic Surgery ProceduresCollagen fleecePenile curvaturePeyronie’s diseasePICS techniqueSealing techniqueTachoSil

Identifiers

PMID31053920
OpenAlexW2942662309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.