ArticleScientific reports2019
Regularity is not a key factor for encoding repetition in rapid image streams.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From the brain's encoding of input dynamics to its behavior: neural dynamics shape bias in decision making.Communications biology · 2024Article
- The fate of visual long term memories for images across weeks in adults and children.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human observers readily detect targets and repetitions in streams of rapidly presented visual stimuli. It seems intuitive that regularly spaced repeating items should be easier to detect than irregularly spaced ones, since regularity adds predictability and in addition has ecological relevance. Here, we show that this is not necessarily the case, and we point out the intrinsic difficulty in addressing this question. We presented long RSVP streams of never-before-seen natural images containing repetition sequences; an image appearing six times interleaved by one or more non-repeating distractors, and asked participants to detect the repetitions and to afterwards identify the repeated images. We found that the ability to detect and memorize repeated images was preserved even with irregular sequences, and conclude that temporal regularity is not a key factor for detection and memory for repeating images in RSVP streams. These findings have implications for models of repetition processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.