ArticleScientific reports2019
PiPred - a deep-learning method for prediction of π-helices in protein sequences.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- PLM-eXplain: divide and conquer the protein embedding space.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- AlphaFold2 captures the conformational landscape of the HAMP signaling domain.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
- Non-canonical helical transitions and conformational switching are associated with characteristic flexibility and disorder indices in TRP and Kv channels.Channels (Austin, Tex.) · 2023Article
- Structural basis of mammalian respiratory complex I inhibition by medicinal biguanides.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- SAINT-Angle: self-attention augmented inception-inside-inception network and transfer learning improve protein backbone torsion angle prediction.Bioinformatics advances · 2023Article
- A structural signature motif enlightens the origin and diversification of nuclear receptors.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Canonical π-helices are short, relatively unstable secondary structure elements found in proteins. They comprise seven or more residues and are present in 15% of all known protein structures, often in functionally important regions such as ligand- and ion-binding sites. Given their similarity to α-helices, the prediction of π-helices is a challenging task and none of the currently available secondary structure prediction methods tackle it. Here, we present PiPred, a neural network-based tool for predicting π-helices in protein sequences. By performing a rigorous benchmark we show that PiPred can detect π-helices with a per-residue precision of 48% and sensitivity of 46%. Interestingly, some of the α-helices mispredicted by PiPred as π-helices exhibit a geometry characteristic of π-helices. Also, despite being trained only with canonical π-helices, PiPred can identify 6-residue-long α/π-bulges. These observations suggest an even higher effective precision of the method and demonstrate that π-helices, α/π-bulges, and other helical deformations may impose similar constraints on sequences. PiPred is freely accessible at: https://toolkit.tuebingen.mpg.de/#/tools/quick2d . A standalone version is available for download at: https://github.com/labstructbioinf/PiPred , where we also provide the CB6133, CB513, CASP10, and CASP11 datasets, commonly used for training and validation of secondary structure prediction methods, with correctly annotated π-helices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.