Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31053685›Full record

ReviewIET nanobiotechnology2019

Investigating the prospects of bacterial biosurfactants for metal nanoparticle synthesis - a comprehensive review.

Femina Carolin Christopher, Senthil Kumar Ponnusamy, Janet Joshiba Ganesan, Racchana Ramamurthy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in IET nanobiotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Green synthesis of Ag, Se, and AgFolia microbiologica · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Design of TiOMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Microemulsion Microstructure(s): A Tutorial Review.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Femina Carolin ChristopherDepartment of Chemical Engineering, SSN College of Engineering, Chennai 603110, India.
Senthil Kumar PonnusamySSN-Centre for Radiation, Environmental Science and Technology (SSN-CREST), SSN College of Engineering, Chennai 603110, India. senthilchem8582@gmail.com.
Janet Joshiba GanesanDepartment of Chemical Engineering, SSN College of Engineering, Chennai 603110, India.
Racchana RamamurthyDepartment of Chemical Engineering, SSN College of Engineering, Chennai 603110, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Establishing biological synthesis of nanoparticles is increasing nowadays in the field of nanotechnology. The search for an optimal source with durability, stability, capacity to withstand higher environmental conditions with excellent characteristics is yet to meet. Consequently, there is need to create an eco-friendly strategy for metal nanoparticle synthesis. One approach investigated in this review is the use of biosurfactants to enhance the synthesis biologically. In comparison with the other technologies, biosurfactants are less toxic and exhibit higher properties. This method is different from the conventional practice like physical and chemical methods. Several research studies represented that the biosurfactant influences the production of nanoparticles about 2-50 nm. In this manner, the research towards the biosurfactant has raised. This review also addressed the feasibility of biosurfactant and their benefits in the synthesis of metallic nanoparticles. The findings from this review can recommend a conceivable use of biosurfactant as a source for metal nanoparticle synthesis.

Indexed as

BacteriaMetal NanoparticlesSurface-Active AgentsSurface-Active Agents

Identifiers

PMID31053685
PMCPMC8676648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.