Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31053651›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2020

Adolescents' perceptions of tobacco accessibility and smoking norms and attitudes in response to the tobacco point-of-sale display ban in Scotland: results from the DISPLAY Study.

Mirte Ag Kuipers, Catherine Best, Michael Wilson, Dorothy Currie, Gozde Ozakinci, Anne-Marie MacKintosh, Martine Stead, Douglas Eadie, Andy MacGregor, Jamie Pearce and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mirte Ag KuipersDepartment of Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8133-1834
Catherine BestFaculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3652-2498
Michael WilsonFaculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0049-208X
Dorothy CurrieSchool of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Gozde OzakinciSchool of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Anne-Marie MacKintoshInstitute for Social Marketing, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Martine SteadInstitute for Social Marketing, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Douglas EadieInstitute for Social Marketing, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Andy MacGregorHead of Policy Research, Scotcen Social Research, Edinburgh, UK.
Jamie PearceCentre for Research on Environment Society and Health, School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0994-7140
Amanda AmosThe Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Sally HawFaculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirlings, Stirling, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 20456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScotland implemented a ban on open display of tobacco products in supermarkets in April 2013, and small shops in April 2015. This study aimed to quantify changes in perceived tobacco accessibility, smoking norms and smoking attitudes among adolescents in Scotland, following the implementation of partial and comprehensive point-of-sale (POS) tobacco display bans.

methodsFrom the Determining the Impact of Smoking Point of Sale Legislation Among Youth (DISPLAY) Study's 2013-2017 annual surveys we retrieved data comprising 6202 observations on 4836 12-17-year-old adolescents from four schools. Applying generalised estimating equations, associations between time (postban: 2016-2017 vs preban:2013) and three outcomes were estimated. Outcomes were perceived commercial access to tobacco, perceived positive smoking norm (friends think it's OK to smoke) and positive smoking attitude (you think it's OK to smoke). Analyses were adjusted for sociodemographics, smoking status, family smoking, friend smoking and e-cigarette use.

resultsCrude trends showed an increase over time in perceived accessibility, norms and attitudes. However, after adjustment for confounders, mainly e-cigarette use, we found significant declines in perceived access (OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.90) and in positive smoking attitude (OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.91), but no change in perceived positive smoking norm (OR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.29). Current/past occasional or regular e-cigarette use was associated with higher odds of perceived access (OR = 3.12, 95% CI 2.32 to 4.21), positive norm (OR = 2.94, 95% CI 2.16 to 4.02) and positive attitude (OR = 3.38, 95% CI 2.35 to 4.87).

conclusionOnly when taking into account that the use of e-cigarettes increased in 2013-2017 did we find that the POS tobacco display ban in supermarkets and small shops in Scotland was followed by reductions in adolescents' perceived accessibility of tobacco and positive attitudes towards smoking.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSocial NormsAdolescentChildCommerceElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFemaleFriendsHumansMaleMarketingOdds RatioPerceptionScotlandSmokingSmoking Preventionadolescentsdisplaypoint of salesmokingsocial normtobacco accesstobacco controltobacco marketingyoung people

Identifiers

PMID31053651
PMCPMC7231455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.