Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31053616›Full record

ReviewGenetics2019

How

Miriam B Goodman, Piali Sengupta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Stereotypical interciliary contacts in abioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Induction and regulation of a reversible form of suspended animation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A multilayered gap junction network is essential for social decision-making.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Miriam B GoodmanDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, California 94304 and mbgoodmn@stanford.edu sengupta@brandeis.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5810-1272
Piali SenguptaDepartment of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454 mbgoodmn@stanford.edu sengupta@brandeis.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7468-0035

Funding

Mechanisms of sensory neuron morphological diversification, signaling, and functional plasticityR35GM122463 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI Piali Sengupta · 2017 to 2026
$7.7M
The biophysics of skin-neuron sensory tactile organs and their sensitivity to mechanical and chemical stressR35NS105092 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOODMAN, MIRIAM B · 2018 to 2025
$6.4M
PROJECT 4: MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR MECHANISMS FOR THERMAL ROBUSTNESS AND MULTISENP01GM103770 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI GARRITY, PAUL · 2013 to 2017
$6.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM103770NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122463NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS105092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Mechanotransduction, CellularSignal TransductionStress, PhysiologicalThermosensingAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansMechanical PhenomenaSensationSensory Receptor CellsTemperatureC. elegansmechanosensationthermosensationWormBook

Identifiers

PMID31053616
PMCPMC6499529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.