Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31053175›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2019

Evaluation of the impact of single-nucleotide polymorphisms on treatment response, survival and toxicity with cytarabine and anthracyclines in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: a systematic review protocol.

Taynah Cascaes Puty, Jonathan Souza Sarraf, Tabata Cristina Do Carmo Almeida, Valter Cordeiro Barbosa Filho, Luis Eduardo Werneck de Carvalho, Fernando Luiz Affonso Fonseca, Fernando Adami

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Polygenic Ara-C Response Score Identifies Pediatric Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Need of Chemotherapy Augmentation.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Taynah Cascaes PutyEnsino e Pesquisa, Oncológica do Brasil Ensino e Pesquisa, Belém, Brazil. taynah.puty@oncologicadobrasil.com.br.ORCID 0000-0002-0380-5731
Jonathan Souza SarrafEnsino e Pesquisa, Oncológica do Brasil Ensino e Pesquisa, Belém, Brazil.
Tabata Cristina Do Carmo AlmeidaLaboratório de Epidemiologia e Análise de Dados, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, Brazil.
Valter Cordeiro Barbosa FilhoFederal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Ceara, Boa Viagem Campus, Boa Viagem, Brazil.
Luis Eduardo Werneck de CarvalhoEnsino e Pesquisa, Oncológica do Brasil Ensino e Pesquisa, Belém, Brazil.
Fernando Luiz Affonso FonsecaLaboratório de Epidemiologia e Análise de Dados, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, Brazil.
Fernando AdamiLaboratório de Epidemiologia e Análise de Dados, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, Brazil.
Faculdade de Medicina do ABC · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcute myeloid leukaemia is the most common type of acute leukaemia in the world. Thus, the study of genetic alterations, such as single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), has contributed to a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying leukaemogenesis, to improve the prognosis and to increase the survival of these patients. However, there is no synthesis of evidence in the literature evaluating the quality of evidence and the risk of bias in the studies such that the results can be translated. Thus, this systematic review protocol aims to assess the impact of SNPs on genes involved in the metabolism of cytarabine and anthracyclines with respect to survival, treatment response and toxicity in patients with AML.

methodsThis systematic review protocol is based on PRISMA guidelines and includes searches in six electronic databases, contact with authors, repositories of clinical trials, and cancer research. Studies published in peer-reviewed journals will be included if they meet the eligibility criteria: (a) samples composed of individuals of any age, of both sexes, with a diagnosis of AML, regardless of the time of diagnosis of disease; (b) participants who have undergone or are undergoing cytarabine- and anthracycline-associated chemotherapy or cytarabine-only chemotherapy; and (c) in vivo studies. Studies that include patients with promyelocytic leukaemia (Fab type 3) will be excluded because this disease has different treatment. The process of study selection, data extraction, and evaluation/synthesis will be performed in duplicate. Assessment of methodological quality and risk of bias will be performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized clinical studies and the Downs-Black Checklist for cohort and case-control studies. The synthesis of evidence will include the level of evidence based on the GRADE protocol. A meta-analysis of the association between SNPs and outcomes may be performed based on Cochrane guidelines. DISCUSSION: It is expected that clinical decisions for AML patients will consider evidence-based practices to contribute to better patient management. In this way, we will be able to define how to treat patients with AML to improve their survival and quality of life. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018100750.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotidePrognosisAnthracyclinesAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCytarabineHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteSurvivalSystematic Reviews as TopicAnthracyclinesAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCytarabineAcute myeloid leukaemiaSNPStandard chemotherapySurvivalToxicity

Identifiers

PMID31053175
PMCPMC6499963
OpenAlexW2947474647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.