Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31053169›Full record

ArticleSkeletal muscle2019

Muscle Gene Sets: a versatile methodological aid to functional genomics in the neuromuscular field.

Apostolos Malatras, Stephanie Duguez, William Duddy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal muscle, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. iScience · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Apostolos MalatrasMyologie Centre de Recherche, Université Sorbonne, UMRS 974 UPMC, INSERM, FRE 3617 CNRS, AIM, Paris, France.
Stephanie DuguezMyologie Centre de Recherche, Université Sorbonne, UMRS 974 UPMC, INSERM, FRE 3617 CNRS, AIM, Paris, France.
William DuddyMyologie Centre de Recherche, Université Sorbonne, UMRS 974 UPMC, INSERM, FRE 3617 CNRS, AIM, Paris, France. w.duddy@ulster.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2239-9094

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe approach of building large collections of gene sets and then systematically testing hypotheses across these collections is a powerful tool in functional genomics, both in the pathway analysis of omics data and to uncover the polygenic effects associated with complex diseases in genome-wide association study. The Molecular Signatures Database includes collections of oncogenic and immunologic signatures enabling researchers to compare transcriptional datasets across hundreds of previous studies and leading to important insights in these fields, but such a resource does not currently exist for neuromuscular research. In previous work, we have shown the utility of gene set approaches to understand muscle cell physiology and pathology.

methodsFollowing a systematic survey of public muscle data, we passed gene expression profiles from 4305 samples through a robust pre-processing and standardized data analysis pipeline. Two hundred eighty-two samples were discarded based on a battery of rigorous global quality controls. From among the remaining studies, 578 comparisons of interest were identified by a combination of text mining and manual curation of the study meta-data. For each comparison, significantly dysregulated genes (FDR adjusted p < 0.05) were identified.

resultsLists of dysregulated genes were divided between upregulated and downregulated to give 1156 Muscle Gene Sets (MGS). This resource is available for download ( www.sys-myo.com/muscle_gene_sets ) and is accessible through three commonly used functional genomics platforms (GSEA, EnrichR, and WebGestalt). Basic guidance and recommendations are provided for the use of MGS through these platforms. In addition, consensus muscle gene sets were created to capture the overlap between the results of similar studies, and analysis of these highlighted the potential for novel disease-relevant findings.

conclusionsThe MGS resource can be used to investigate the behaviour of any list of genes across previous comparisons of muscle conditions, to compare previous studies to one another, and to explore the functional relationship of muscle dysregulation to the Gene Ontology. Its major intended use is in enrichment testing for functional genomics analysis.

Indexed as

SoftwareAnimalsChromosome MappingComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsHumansMiceMuscle, SkeletalOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisTranscriptomeFunctional enrichmentFunctional genomicsGene expressionGene setsGWASNeuromuscularPathway analysisSkeletal muscleTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID31053169
PMCPMC6498474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.