Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31053124›Full record

ArticleMicrobial cell factories2019

Shake flask methodology for assessing the influence of the maximum oxygen transfer capacity on 2,3-butanediol production.

Benedikt Heyman, Robin Lamm, Hannah Tulke, Lars Regestein, Jochen Büchs

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial cell factories, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Production of Biosurfactant byInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Engineering riboflavin-overproducingSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Pilot Scale Production of a FBiotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Respiration-based investigation of adsorbent-bioprocess compatibility.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. High-Efficient Production of (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benedikt HeymanRWTH Aachen University, AVT-Biochemical Engineering, Forckenbeckstraße 51, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Robin LammRWTH Aachen University, AVT-Biochemical Engineering, Forckenbeckstraße 51, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Hannah TulkeRWTH Aachen University, AVT-Biochemical Engineering, Forckenbeckstraße 51, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Lars RegesteinRWTH Aachen University, AVT-Biochemical Engineering, Forckenbeckstraße 51, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Jochen BüchsRWTH Aachen University, AVT-Biochemical Engineering, Forckenbeckstraße 51, 52074, Aachen, Germany. jochen.buechs@avt.rwth-aachen.de.
RWTH Aachen University · DELeibniz-Institut für Naturstoff-Forschung und Infektionsbiologie e. V. - Hans-Knöll-Institut (HKI) · DE

Funding

Excellence Initiative by the German federal and state governments to promote science and research at German universities Cluster of Excellence "Tailor-Made Fuels from Biomass" EXC 236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProduction of 2,3-butanediol from renewable resources is a promising measure to decrease the consumption of fossil resources in the chemical industry. One of the most influential parameters on biotechnological 2,3-butanediol production is the oxygen availability during the cultivation. As 2,3-butanediol is produced under microaerobic process conditions, a well-controlled oxygen supply is the key parameter to control biomass formation and 2,3-butanediol production. As biomass is on the one hand not the final product, but on the other hand the essential biocatalyst, the optimal compromise between biomass formation and 2,3-butanediol production has to be defined.

resultsA shake flask methodology is presented to evaluate the effects of oxygen availability on 2,3-butanediol production with Bacillus licheniformis DSM 8785 by variation of the filling volume. A defined two-stage cultivation strategy was developed to investigate the metabolic response to different defined maximum oxygen transfer capacities at equal initial growth conditions. The respiratory quotient was measured online to determine the point of glucose depletion, as 2,3-butanediol is consumed afterwards. Based on this strategy, comparable results to stirred tank reactors were achieved. The highest space-time yield (1.3 g/L/h) and a 2,3-butanediol concentration of 68 g/L combined with low acetoin concentrations and avoided glycerol formation were achieved at a maximum oxygen transfer capacity of 13 mmol/L/h. The highest overall 2,3-butanediol concentration of 78 g/L was observed at a maximum oxygen transfer capacity of 4 mmol/L/h.

conclusionsThe presented shake flask approach reduces the experimental effort and costs providing a fast and reliable methodology to investigate the effects of oxygen availability. This can be applied especially on product and by-product formation under microaerobic conditions. Utilization of the maximum oxygen transfer capacity as measure for the oxygen availability allows for an easy adaption to other bioreactor setups and scales.

Indexed as

Bacillus licheniformisBatch Cell Culture TechniquesBioreactorsButylene GlycolsFermentationGlucoseOxygen2,3-butylene glycolButylene GlycolsGlucoseOxygen2,3-ButanediolAcetoinAnoxicBacillus licheniformisMicroaerobic conditionsOnline monitoringOxygen availabilityOxygen transfer rateRespiratory quotientScalability

Identifiers

PMID31053124
PMCPMC6498610
OpenAlexW2942514276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.