ArticleBMC ophthalmology2019
Ocular size and shape in lens-induced Myopization in young Guinea pigs.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital measuring the ocular morphological parameters of guinea pig eyeInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- IMI 2021 Yearly Digest.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021Review
- Article
- Altered Expression of GJD2 Messenger RNA and the Coded Protein Connexin 36 in Negative Lens-induced Myopia of Guinea Pigs.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLens-induced myopization in guinea pigs has been used as model for the process of myopization in humans. It has not been explored yet whether the change in globe shape in eyes undergoing myopization is similar in experimental myopia in guinea pigs and in clinical myopia in patients.
methodsThe study included 70 guinea pigs (age:2-3 weeks) equally divided into a study group with lens-induced myopization for 5 weeks, and a control group wearing goggles with no refractive power. The globe diameters were measured using a microcaliper after enucleation.
resultsThe horizontal globe diameter (9.19 ± 0.15 mm versus 9.15 ± 0.18 mm; P = 0.25) and vertical globe diameter (9.02 ± 0.11 mm versus 8.99 ± 0.14 mm; P = 0.29) did not differ significantly between the study group and control group. The sagittal diameter was significantly longer in the study group (8.96 ± 0.15 mm versus 8.84 ± 0.14 mm; P = 0.001). While the vertical and horizontal globe diameters were correlated with each other in a ratio of approximately 1:1 (non-standardized regression coefficient B:0.94;95% confidence interval (CI):0.73,1.15), the steepness of the regression lines of the associations of both diameters with the sagittal diameter were flatter (horizontal to sagittal diameter: B: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.44,0.83; vertical to sagittal diameter:B:0.55;95% CI:0.41,0.69). Correspondingly, the ratios of horizontal-to-sagittal globe diameter and of vertical-to-sagittal globe diameter decreased (P < 0.001) with longer sagittal diameter.
conclusionsFor each mm axial elongation in young guinea pigs the horizontal globe diameter increased by 0.64 mm (95%CI:0.44,0.83) and the vertical diameter by 0.55 mm (95% CI:0.41,0.69), indicating that the globe enlargement occurred predominantly in the sagittal direction. Axial elongation in guinea pigs led to a similar relative change in ocular shape as in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.