Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31053090›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Identification of community-dwelling older adults at risk of frailty using the PERSSILAA screening pathway: a methodological guide and results of a large-scale deployment in the Netherlands.

Stephanie Jansen-Kosterink, Lex van Velsen, Sanne Frazer, Marit Dekker-van Weering, Rónán O'Caoimh, Miriam Vollenbroek-Hutten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comparison of Frailty Screening Instruments in the Emergency Department.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Trial
  3. Development of a Novel Frailty Trigger for Use at Triage in the Emergency Department.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Frailty in an Adult Acute Hospital Population: Predictors, Prevalence, and Outcomes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephanie Jansen-KosterinkRoessingh Research and Development, Roessinghsbleekweg 33b, 7522, AL, Enschede, The Netherlands. s.jansen@rrd.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2095-7104
Lex van VelsenRoessingh Research and Development, Roessinghsbleekweg 33b, 7522, AL, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Sanne FrazerRoessingh Research and Development, Roessinghsbleekweg 33b, 7522, AL, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Marit Dekker-van WeeringRoessingh Research and Development, Roessinghsbleekweg 33b, 7522, AL, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Rónán O'CaoimhCentre for Gerontology and Rehabilitation, University College Cork, Cork City, Ireland.
Miriam Vollenbroek-HuttenUniversity of Twente, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Telemedicine group, Enschede, the Netherlands.

Funding

FP7 Ideas: European Research Council FP7-ICT-610359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmong community-dwelling older adults, frailty is highly prevalent and recognized as a major public health concern. To prevent frailty it is important to identify those at risk of becoming frail, but at present, no accepted screening procedure is available.

methodsThe screening process developed as part of the PERSSILAA project is a two-step screening pathway. First, older adults are asked to complete a self-screening questionnaire to assess their general health status and their level of decline on physical, cognitive and nutritional domains. Second, older adults who, according to step one, are at risk of becoming frail, are invited for a face-to-face assessment focusing on the domains in depth. We deployed the PERSSILAA screening procedure in primary care in the Netherlands.

resultsIn total, baseline data were available for 3777 community-dwelling older adults (mean age 69.9 (SD ± 3.8)) who completed first step screening. Based on predefined cut-off scores, 16.8% of the sample were classified as frail (n = 634), 20.6% as pre-frail (n = 777), and 62.3% as robust (n = 2353). Frail subjects were referred back to their GP without going through the second step. Of the pre-frail older adults, 69.7% had evidence of functional decline on the physical domain, 67% were overweight or obese and 31.0% had evidence of cognitive decline.

conclusionPre-frailty is common among community-dwelling older adults. The PERSSILAA screening approach is a multi-factor, two-step screening process, potentially useful for primary prevention to identify those at risk of frailty and who will benefit most from preventive strategies.

Indexed as

Health StatusHealth Status IndicatorsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFrail ElderlyFrailtyGeriatric AssessmentHealth PromotionHumansIndependent LivingMaleMass ScreeningNetherlandsPrevalenceFrailOlder adultsOutcomePre-frailPrimary preventionScreening

Identifiers

PMID31053090
PMCPMC6500037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.