Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31053084›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2019

Heterogeneity of treatment effect by baseline risk of mortality in critically ill patients: re-analysis of three recent sepsis and ARDS randomised controlled trials.

Shalini Santhakumaran, Anthony Gordon, A Toby Prevost, Cecilia O'Kane, Daniel F McAuley, Manu Shankar-Hari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Between-trial heterogeneity in ARDS research.Intensive care medicine · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Simvastatin in Critically Ill Patients with Covid-19.The New England journal of medicine · 2023
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Equilibrating SSC guidelines with individualized care.Critical care (London, England) · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shalini SanthakumaranImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, W12 7RH, UK.
Anthony GordonSection of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Imperial College London, London, W2 1NY, UK.
A Toby PrevostImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, W12 7RH, UK.
Cecilia O'KaneCentre for Experimental Medicine, Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Belfast, BT9 7AE, UK.
Daniel F McAuleyCentre for Experimental Medicine, Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Belfast, BT9 7AE, UK.
Manu Shankar-HariDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust , Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK. manu.shankar-hari@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5338-2538
Imperial College London · GBRoyal Victoria Hospital · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health CS-2016-16-011Department of Health EME/16/33/01Department of Health NIHR/CS/009/007Department of Health PB-PG-0610-22350Department of Health RP-2015-06-018Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme 16/33/01Medical Research Council MC_G1002460Medical Research Council MC_PC_13093Research Trainees Coordinating Centre NIHR-CS-2016-16-011Research Trainees Coordinating Centre RP-2015-06-018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling patients with sepsis or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) generate heterogeneous trial populations. Non-random variation in the treatment effect of an intervention due to differences in the baseline risk of death between patients in a population represents one form of heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE). We assessed whether HTE in two sepsis and one ARDS RCTs could explain indeterminate trial results and inform future trial design.

methodsWe assessed HTE for vasopressin, hydrocortisone and levosimendan in sepsis and simvastatin in ARDS patients, on 28-day mortality, using the total Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score as the baseline risk measurement, comparing above (high) and below (low) the median score. Secondary risk measures were the acute physiology component of APACHE II and predicted risk of mortality using the APACHE II score. HTE was quantified both in additive (difference in risk difference (RD)) and multiplicative (ratio of relative risks (RR)) scales using estimated treatment differences from a logistic regression model with treatment risk as the interaction term.

resultsThe ratio of the odds of death in the highest APACHE II quartile was 4.9 to 7.4 times compared to the lowest quartile, across the three trials. We did not observe HTE for vasopressin, hydrocortisone and levosimendan in the two sepsis trials. In the HARP-2 trial, simvastatin reduced mortality in the low APACHE II group and increased mortality in the high APACHE II group (difference in RD = 0.34 (0.12, 0.55) (p = 0.02); ratio of RR 3.57 (1.77, 7.17) (p < 0.001). The HTE patterns were inconsistent across the secondary risk measures. The sensitivity analyses of HTE effects for vasopressin, hydrocortisone and levosimendan were consistent with the main analyses and attenuated for simvastatin.

conclusionsWe assessed HTE in three recent ICU RCTs, using multivariable baseline risk of death models. There was considerable within-trial variation in the baseline risk of death. We observed potential HTE for simvastatin in ARDS, but no evidence of HTE for vasopressin, hydrocortisone or levosimendan in the two sepsis trials. Our findings could be explained either by true lack of HTE (no benefit of vasopressin, hydrocortisone or levosimendan vs comparator for any patient subgroups) or by lack of power to detect HTE. Our results require validation using similar trial databases.

Indexed as

Treatment OutcomeAdultAgedAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAPACHECardiotonic AgentsCritical IllnessFemaleGuideline AdherenceHospital MortalityHumansHydrocortisoneHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCardiotonic AgentsHydrocortisoneHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsSimendanSimvastatinVasoconstrictor AgentsVasopressinsModels, statisticalRandomisationRiskSepsis, acute respiratory distress syndromeStudy design

Identifiers

PMID31053084
PMCPMC6500045
OpenAlexW2947063690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.