Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31052598›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Revealing Drug-Target Interactions with Computational Models and Algorithms.

Liqian Zhou, Zejun Li, Jialiang Yang, Geng Tian, Fuxing Liu, Hong Wen, Li Peng, Min Chen, Ju Xiang, Lihong Peng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Liqian ZhouSchool of Computer Science, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 412007, Hunan, China. zhoulq11@163.com.
Zejun LiSchool of Computer Science, Hunan Institute of Technology, Henyang 421002, Hunan, China. lzjfox@163.com.
Jialiang YangGeneis (Beijing) Co. Ltd., Beijing 100102, China. yangjl@geneis.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-4689-8672
Geng TianGeneis (Beijing) Co. Ltd., Beijing 100102, China. tiang@geneis.com.
Fuxing LiuSchool of Computer Science, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 412007, Hunan, China. liufxicloud@me.com.
Hong WenSchool of Computer Science, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 412007, Hunan, China. wenh_hut@163.com.
Li PengSchool of Computer Science, University of Science and Technology of Hunan, Xiangtan 411201, Hunan, China. plpeng@hnu.edu.cn.
Min ChenSchool of Computer Science, Hunan Institute of Technology, Henyang 421002, Hunan, China. chenmin@hnit.edu.cn.
Ju XiangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China. xiangju@csu.edu.cn.
Lihong PengSchool of Computer Science, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 412007, Hunan, China. plhhnu@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2321-3901

Funding

the Natural Science Foundation of China 61803151the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan province 2018JJ3570the Project of Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department 17A052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying possible drug-target interactions (DTIs) has become an important task in drug research and development. Although high-throughput screening is becoming available, experimental methods narrow down the validation space because of extremely high cost, low success rate, and time consumption. Therefore, various computational models have been exploited to infer DTI candidates.

methodsWe introduced relevant databases and packages, mainly provided a comprehensive review of computational models for DTI identification, including network-based algorithms and machine learning-based methods. Specially, machine learning-based methods mainly include bipartite local model, matrix factorization, regularized least squares, and deep learning.

resultsAlthough computational methods have obtained significant improvement in the process of DTI prediction, these models have their limitations. We discussed potential avenues for boosting DTI prediction accuracy as well as further directions.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipComputer SimulationDatabases, FactualDrug DiscoveryMachine LearningSoftwarecomputational modelsdrug repositioningdrug-target interaction predictionmachine learning-based methodsnetwork-based methods

Identifiers

PMID31052598
PMCPMC6540161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.