Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31052561›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Predicting the Toxicity of Ionic Liquids toward Acetylcholinesterase Enzymes Using Novel QSAR Models.

Peng Zhu, Xuejing Kang, Yongsheng Zhao, Ullah Latif, Hongzhong Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ionic Liquids-A Review of Their Toxicity to Living Organisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Ionic Liquids Toxicity-Benefits and Threats.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peng ZhuSchool of Materials Science and Energy Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan 528000, China. yszhao@sjtu.edu.cn.
Xuejing KangSchool of Material and Chemical Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou 450001, China. xuejing_kang@hotmail.com.
Yongsheng ZhaoDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-5080, USA. yzhao01@ucsb.edu.
Ullah LatifDepartment Beijing Key Laboratory of Ionic Liquids Clean Process, Key Laboratory of Green Process and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Complex Systems, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China. latifucas@hotmail.com.
Hongzhong ZhangSchool of Material and Chemical Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou 450001, China. zhz@zzuli.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Limited information on the potential toxicity of ionic liquids (ILs) becomes the bottleneck that creates a barrier in their large-scale application. In this work, two quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) models were used to evaluate the toxicity of ILs toward the acetylcholinesterase enzyme using multiple linear regression (MLR) and extreme learning machine (ELM) algorithms. The structures of 57 cations and 21 anions were optimized using quantum chemistry calculations. The electrostatic potential surface area (

Indexed as

AcetylcholinesteraseAnimalsCholinesterase InhibitorsHumansInhibitory Concentration 50Ionic LiquidsLinear ModelsMachine LearningModels, BiologicalQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipAcetylcholinesteraseCholinesterase InhibitorsIonic Liquidsacetylcholinesterase enzymeextreme learning machineionic liquidsmultiple linear regressiontoxicity

Identifiers

PMID31052561
PMCPMC6539465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.