ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2019
Mechanical Characterization of Different Aluminium Foams at High Strain Rates.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fabrication of Two-Layer Aluminum Foam Consisting of Dissimilar Aluminum Alloys Using Optical Heating.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Research on Impact Resistance of Aluminum Alloy New Rotating Thin-Walled Structures.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Application of Lightweight Structure in Automobile Bumper Beam: A Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Special Issue 'Advanced and High Performance Metallic Foams'.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Preparation and properties of rigid polyurethane foams added with graphene oxide-hollow glass microspheres hybrid.Designed monomers and polymers · 2021Article
- Theoretical Analysis of Blast Protection of Graded Metal Foam-Cored Sandwich Cylinders/Rings.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- 2D Finite Element Modeling of the Cutting Force in Peripheral Milling of Cellular Metals.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Mechanical Characterization of Different Aluminium Foams at High Strain Rates.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Samples having nominal compositions of AlSi12 and Al6082-T4 were prepared using a lost wax casting process, with nominal relative densities of 20%, 40%, and 60%, as well as arrangements of a uniform cell structure (US) or a dual-size cell (DS). For comparison, samples of aluminium foam-filled tubes having the same nominal composition were also prepared with the same technique, with nominal relative densities of 20% and similar arrangements (US and DS). Impact tests at different velocities were performed using a split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB). It is possible to conclude that Al6082-T4 foams have better performance, in both configurations, than the AlSi12 ones. Considering a uniform cell structure and a density of 20%, the absorbed energy by the Al6082-T4 foams was around 25% higher than the value observed for the AlSi12 ones. In terms of arrangement, the US structure presents absorbed energy around 57% lower than the DS ones, while the AlSi12 foams with a relative density of 20% were compared. Finally, the absorbed energy growths from 2.8 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.