ArticleMicromachines2019
On the Impact of the Fabrication Method on the Performance of 3D Printed Mixers.
Article in Micromachines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D-Printed Microfluidic Chip System with Integrated Fluidic Breakers and Phaseguide Fluid Structures for Optimal Passive Mixing.Micromachines · 2026Article
- 3D Printing in Biocatalysis and Biosensing: From General Concepts to Practical Applications.Chemistry, an Asian journal · 2024Review
- 3D-Printed MEMS in Italy.Micromachines · 2024Review
- Versatile Microfluidics for Biofabrication Platforms Enabled by an Agile and Inexpensive Fabrication Pipeline.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023Article
- Centrifugation-Assisted Three-Dimensional Printing of Devices Embedded with Fully Enclosed Microchannels.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2023Article
- 3D printing in biotechnology-An insight into miniaturized and microfluidic systems for applications from cell culture to bioanalytics.Engineering in life sciences · 2022Review
- Time-efficient fabrication method for 3D-printed microfluidic devices.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A Review on Additive Manufacturing of Micromixing Devices.Micromachines · 2021Review
- The State of the Art of Material Jetting-A Critical Review.Polymers · 2021Review
- Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) for Manufacturing of Microfluidic Micromixers: An Experimental Study on the Effect of Process Variables in Printed Microfluidic Micromixers.Micromachines · 2021Article
- Study of Microchannels Fabricated Using Desktop Fused Deposition Modeling Systems.Micromachines · 2020Article
- Interconnectable solid-liquid protein extraction unit and chip-based dilution for multiplexed consumer immunodiagnostics.Analytica chimica acta · 2020Article
- Microfluidics: Innovations in Materials and Their Fabrication and Functionalization.Analytical chemistry · 2020Review
- 3D-Printed Lab-on-a-Chip Diagnostic Systems-Developing a Safe-by-Design Manufacturing Approach.Micromachines · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A wide variety of 3D printing technologies have been used for the fabrication of lab-on-a-chip (LOC) devices in recent years. Despite the large number of studies having examined the use of 3D printing technologies in microfluidic devices, the effect of the fabrication method on their performance has received little attention. In this paper, a comparison is shown between unibody-LOC micro-mixers, a particular type of monolithic design for 3D printed LOCs, fabricated in polyjet, stereolithography (SLA) and fused deposition modelling (FDM or FFF) platforms, paying particular attention to the inherent limitations of each fabrication platform and how these affect the performance of the manufactured devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.