Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31052267›Full record

ArticleToxins2019

Dissecting Toxicity: The Venom Gland Transcriptome and the Venom Proteome of the Highly Venomous Scorpion

Jimena I Cid-Uribe, Erika P Meneses, Cesar V F Batista, Ernesto Ortiz, Lourival D Possani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxins, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Toxinology in the proteomics era: a review on arachnid venom proteomics.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Reduced Toxicity ofToxins · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Armed stem to stinger: a review of the ecological roles of scorpion weapons.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Voltage-Gated KFrontiers in pharmacology · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jimena I Cid-UribeDepartamento de Medicina Molecular y Bioprocesos, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Avenida Universidad 2001, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62210, Mexico. jcidu@ibt.unam.mx.ORCID 0000-0001-6101-4594
Erika P MenesesLaboratorio Universitario de Proteómica, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Avenida Universidad 2001, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62210, Mexico. pkas@ibt.unam.mx.
Cesar V F BatistaLaboratorio Universitario de Proteómica, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Avenida Universidad 2001, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62210, Mexico. fbatista@ibt.unam.mx.
Ernesto OrtizDepartamento de Medicina Molecular y Bioprocesos, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Avenida Universidad 2001, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62210, Mexico. erne@ibt.unam.mx.ORCID 0000-0002-8713-0224
Lourival D PossaniDepartamento de Medicina Molecular y Bioprocesos, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Avenida Universidad 2001, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62210, Mexico. possani@ibt.unam.mx.ORCID 0000-0001-6357-2661

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Venom glands and soluble venom from the Mexican scorpion

Indexed as

ProteomeTranscriptomeAnimalsArthropod ProteinsExocrine GlandsFemaleMaleScorpionsScorpion VenomsArthropod ProteinsProteomeScorpion VenomsCentruroides limpidus Karchproteomescorpiontranscriptomevenom toxicity

Identifiers

PMID31052267
PMCPMC6563264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.