Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31052253›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2019

An Overview of Molecular Modeling for Drug Discovery with Specific Illustrative Examples of Applications.

Maral Aminpour, Carlo Montemagno, Jack A Tuszynski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. ADMET & DMPK · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Directional ΔJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Recent progress in general force fields of small molecules.Current opinion in structural biology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maral AminpourDepartment of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada. aminpour@ualberta.ca.
Carlo MontemagnoDepartment of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada. chancellor@siu.edu.
Jack A TuszynskiDepartment of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada. jackt@ualberta.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-9976-0429

Funding

Alberta Innovates - Technology Futures 111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper we review the current status of high-performance computing applications in the general area of drug discovery. We provide an introduction to the methodologies applied at atomic and molecular scales, followed by three specific examples of implementation of these tools. The first example describes in silico modeling of the adsorption of small molecules to organic and inorganic surfaces, which may be applied to drug delivery issues. The second example involves DNA translocation through nanopores with major significance to DNA sequencing efforts. The final example offers an overview of computer-aided drug design, with some illustrative examples of its usefulness.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryModels, MolecularAlgorithmsComputer-Aided DesignDrug DesignGenomicsModels, TheoreticalMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationNanoporesOrganic ChemicalsSequence Analysis, DNAStructure-Activity RelationshipOrganic ChemicalsbiomaterialDNA sequencingdrug discoverymolecular modeling

Identifiers

PMID31052253
PMCPMC6539951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.