Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31051141›Full record

ArticleMolecular cell2019

Reversible Disruption of Specific Transcription Factor-DNA Interactions Using CRISPR/Cas9.

S Ali Shariati, Antonia Dominguez, Shicong Xie, Marius Wernig, Lei S Qi, Jan M Skotheim

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cell, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Inhibition of OCT4 binding at theFrontiers in oncology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S Ali ShariatiDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Antonia DominguezDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Shicong XieDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Marius WernigDepartment of Pathology, Stem Cell Institute, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Lei S QiDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Stanford ChEM-H, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Jan M SkotheimDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: skotheim@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Mechanisms of restriction point response to dynamic growth factor signalsR01GM092925 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SKOTHEIM, JAN M · 2010 to 2018
$2.8M
Determining feedback mechanisms between cell cycle and cell fate in pluripotent cellsK99GM126027 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHARIATI, ALI · 2018 to 2019
$109k
Determining feedback mechanisms linking cell cycle control and stem cell pluripotency using an engineered CRISPR/dCas9 systemF32GM123576 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHARIATI, ALI · 2017 to 2017
$59k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM123576NIGMS NIH HHS K99 GM126027NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM092925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The control of gene expression by transcription factor binding sites frequently determines phenotype. However, it is difficult to determine the function of single transcription factor binding sites within larger transcription networks. Here, we use deactivated Cas9 (dCas9) to disrupt binding to specific sites, a method we term CRISPRd. Since CRISPR guide RNAs are longer than transcription factor binding sites, flanking sequence can be used to target specific sites. Targeting dCas9 to an Oct4 site in the Nanog promoter displaced Oct4 from this site, reduced Nanog expression, and slowed division. In contrast, disrupting the Oct4 binding site adjacent to Pax6 upregulated Pax6 transcription and disrupting Nanog binding its own promoter upregulated its transcription. Thus, we can easily distinguish between activating and repressing binding sites and examine autoregulation. Finally, multiple guide RNA expression allows simultaneous inhibition of multiple binding sites, and conditionally destabilized dCas9 allows rapid reversibility.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesCRISPR-Associated Protein 9CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMiceMouse Embryonic Stem CellsNanog Homeobox ProteinOctamer Transcription Factor-3PAX6 Transcription FactorPromoter Regions, GeneticRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsTranscriptional ActivationTranscription FactorsCRISPR-Associated Protein 9Nanog Homeobox ProteinNanog protein, mouseOctamer Transcription Factor-3Pax6 protein, mousePAX6 Transcription FactorPou5f1 protein, mouseRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID31051141
PMCPMC6599634
OpenAlexW2951926033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.