Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31050913›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental research2019

Nanogel-Based Filler-Matrix Interphase for Polymerization Stress Reduction.

B M Fronza, I Y Rad, P K Shah, M D Barros, M Giannini, J W Stansbury

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Photopolymerization shrinkage-stress reduction in polymer-based dental restoratives by surface modification of fillers.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

B M Fronza1 Restorative Dentistry Department, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8444-3225
I Y Rad2 Craniofacial Biology Department, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
P K Shah3 Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5839-1687
M D Barros2 Craniofacial Biology Department, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
M Giannini1 Restorative Dentistry Department, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
J W Stansbury2 Craniofacial Biology Department, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

Application of Nanogel-modified Resins for Improved Polymeric Dental MaterialsR01DE022348 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI STANSBURY, JEFFREY W. · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE022348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A novel filler-resin matrix interphase structure was developed and evaluated for dental composite restoratives. Nanogel additives were chemically attached to the filler surface to use this created interphase as a potential source of compliance to minimize stress development during polymerization. In addition, we evaluated the effects of free nanogel dispersion into the resin matrix, combined or not with nanogel-modified fillers. Nanogels with varied characteristics were synthesized (i.e., size, 5 and 11 nm; glass transition temperature, 28 °C to 65 °C). Glass fillers were treated with trimethoxyvinylsilane and further reacted with thiol-functionalized nanogels via a free radical thiol-ene reaction. γ-Methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane-surface treated fillers were used as a control. Composites were formulated with BisGMA/TEGDMA resin blend with 60 wt% fillers with nanogel-modified fillers and/or free nanogel additives at 15 wt% in the resin phase. Polymerization kinetics, polymerization stress, volumetric shrinkage, and rheological and mechanical properties were evaluated to provide comprehensive characterization. Nanogel-modified fillers significantly reduced the polymerization stress from 2.2 MPa to 1.7 to 1.4 MPa, resulting in 20% stress reduction. A significantly greater nanogel content was required to generate the same magnitude stress reduction when the nanogels were dispersed only in the resin phase. When the nanogel-modified filler surface treatment and resin-dispersed nanogel strategies were combined, there was a stress reduction of 50% (values of 1.2 to 1.1 MPa). Polymerization rate and volumetric shrinkage were significantly reduced for systems with nanogel additives into the resin. Notably, the flexural modulus of the materials was not compromised, although a slight reduction in flexural strength associated with the nanogel-modified interphase was observed. Overall, modest amounts of free nanogel additives in the resin phase can be effectively combined with a limited nanogel content filler-resin interphase to lower volumetric shrinkage and dramatically reduce overall polymerization stress of composites.

Indexed as

Composite ResinsDental MaterialsNanogelsMaterials TestingMethacrylatesPliabilityPolymerizationPolymethacrylic AcidsStress, MechanicalSurface PropertiesComposite ResinsDental MaterialsMethacrylatesNanogelsPolymethacrylic Acidsdental compositesinterfacemethacrylatesphotopolymerizationpolymerssilanes

Identifiers

PMID31050913
PMCPMC6589896
OpenAlexW2943072668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.